ISIS Beheadings on Cue from Washington and London?

Finian CUNNINGHAM | 16.09.2014 | 00:01

The gruesome beheading of a British aid worker by the ISIS terror group in Syria over the weekend provoked a stern warning from Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron who vowed to “hunt down the murderers” for their “act of pure evil”. The British victim was named as David Haines, a 44-year-old aid worker, who had been held hostage in Syria for many months. A graphic video released by his killers shows Haines kneeling on the ground dressed in an orange jumpsuit as a masked executioner severs his throat with a knife. The dead man’s prone body is then filmed with a decapitated, bloody head placed on the corpse’s back. Some analysts have disputed the veracity of the video, saying it is a fake. But Haine’s foreboding demeanor and his final words spoken to the camera tend to verify the recording as genuine. The British government has also stated that it believes the footage to be authentic.                                                    Haines was the third Westerner to be apparently murdered by the ISIS militants in the past four weeks using the same macabre ritual.Earlier this month, on September 3, a video showed American journalist Steven Sotloff also being decapitated in the same grisly manner. Two weeks before that, another abducted American citizen, James Foley, also a journalist, met the same grim fate at the hands of his captors. A fourth man, another British national named as Alan Hemming, is feared to be the next ISIS victim, with unconfirmed video footage of his execution also posted this weekend. The shocking scenes of brutality have sparked public outrage in the US and around the world. President Barack Obama addressed the nation in a prime-time television broadcast last week in which he declared that American forces would track down and destroy the ISIS terrorists. The group is also known by the alternative acronyms IS or ISIL, referring ostensibly to an aspired fundamentalist Islamic caliphate that incorporates Iraq and Syria. At the same time that Obama was addressing the nation, US secretary of state John Kerry was in the Middle East drumming up support for an American-led international coalition to launch military strikes against ISIS, whose strongholds are in northern Iraq straddling the border with eastern Syria. ISIS has been a prominent force among a myriad of militant cohorts that have been waging war against the Syrian state since March 2011. There is substantial evidence that Western governments have been covertly supporting ISIS and other extremists under the guise of assisting the “moderate rebels” for the ultimate purpose of destabilizing the Assad government of Syria and regime change. Assad is a staunch ally of Russia and Iran, and therefore is in the Western crosshairs for regime change. But latterly ISIS has gained notoriety for its kidnapping and murder of Western citizens.  The newly formed US-led coalition against ISIS includes 10 Arab countries comprising Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan as well as the Persian Gulf kingdoms of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. Paradoxically, it may seem, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been accused of being leading financial sponsors of the extremist groups fighting in Syria, including ISIS. But this link is not so paradoxical when the covert Western-designated role of the terror group is understood, as we shall see. Washington has also, not surprisingly, garnered the support of Britain, France, Germany, Canada and Australia for its supposed anti-ISIS coalition. A meeting this week in Paris will allegedly firm up military tactics on how the US-led coalition will carry out its putative strikes. So far, Washington has said that it will not be committing ground troops as in the previous Iraq War (2003-2012) and the ongoing US-led campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Obama said the modus operandi against ISIS would be like its “counter-terror operations in Yemen and Somalia”, where US air power is assisted by “partners on the ground”. The fledgling Iraqi government of Prime Minister Haider al Abadi has welcomed the US air strikes. Since last month, American warplanes have launched nearly 150 bombing raids on suspected ISIS positions in northern Iraq. Last week saw the widening of these US air strikes to include western Iraq near Haditha. Because of Baghdad’s approval, the US-led coalition has legal cover to operate in Iraq. But this is not the case in neighboring Syria. The Syrian government of President Bashar al Assad has not given its consent to the American plans, nor has it been consulted. Washington claims that Assad has no legitimacy or right to sovereignty because it alleges his “regime” has been repressing the civilian population – a claim that is contradicted by the re-election of Assad as president in June with a massive 88.7 per cent majority based on a voter turnout of 73.4 per cent. Damascus has pointed out that any US military action in its territory – even if that action is against the enemy ISIS network – will amount to aggression against the Syrian state. The objective legal position was also stipulated by the Russian government this week. Moscow said that, without Syrian government consent or a United Nations Security Council mandate, any US-led air strikes inside Syria would be “a gross violation of international law”. Nevertheless, Obama has unequivocally stated that his proposed military coalition will conduct attacks on ISIS bases inside Syria. The legal implications of that contingency, however, appear to be unnerving the main US NATO allies – Britain, France and Germany. In Berlin last week both the German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his British counterpart Philip Hammond issued categorical statements saying that their countries would not be carrying out air strikes in Syria. Hammond, like Steinmeier, gave full backing to US strikes against ISIS in Iraq, but he told the Reuters news agency: “Let me be clear: Britain will not be taking part in any air strikes in Syria. We have already had that discussion in our parliament last year and we won't be revisiting that position.” Britain’s top diplomat added that the “legal permissiveness” of military operations in Iraq and Syria was completely different. Hammond was referring to the vote in the British parliament last year in which MPs voted overwhelmingly against Britain joining a proposed American military intervention in Syria, following the deadly chemical weapons attack near Damascus on August 21. Washington was lining up air strikes on Syria to purportedly avenge the killing of hundreds of civilians from poisonous gas. That incident was blamed on the armed forces of the Assad government but it was subsequently shown to be the covert work of anti-government militants, aimed at contriving as a false flag outrage to elicit Western military intervention. The British parliament was therefore vindicated in its vote against military intervention in Syria, and that vote put paid to Washington’s plans back then. It signaled a rare British dissent in the “special relationship” with Washington, where Britain is usually a reliable junior partner for American militarism overseas. At the time of the Westminster vote at the end of August 2013, British leader David Cameron was visibly downcast at the rejection of the proposed intervention in Syria. Given that the British government is a major player in the US-led regime-change conspiracy in Syria, Cameron’s dismay was understandable.  This week on the day after Hammond made the announcement in Berlin of non-intervention in Syria, he appeared to be over-ruled by his boss in 10 Downing Street. David Cameron contradicted his foreign minister by telling British media that “nothing had been ruled out” for Britain’s participation in the American-led anti-ISIS coalition. Cameron was clearly indicating that British fighter jets might indeed launch air strikes inside Syria. Such a move would over-turn the British parliament’s landmark vote outlawing military intervention in Syria. It would also negate the majority sentiment of the British public, which has been trending strong opposition to their government becoming embroiled militarily in Syria. However, graphic videos of extremists slicing off the head of a British aid worker could be a decisive turning point. It’s hard to imagine a more repugnant act of cruel depravity to turn public opinion away from its erstwhile opposition to war toward giving consent for military action to, as Cameron put it, “hunt down this pure evil”. Note too that in recent weeks Western governments and their mass media have been raising security concerns about Western “jihadists” returning to their home countries to carry out terror missions. Australia’s government of Tony Abbott is the latest to put its country on “high alert”. Abbott told media this weekend that his government was also sending a 600-man military force to the Middle East to join the US-led coalition, and he cited the barbaric beheading of the British national as part of the reasoning for the Australian deployment. The macabre video executions have also overturned anti-war public feeling in the US. When Obama was planning to launch air strikes in Syria last year following the chemical weapons incident, polls showed that a big majority – 70 per cent – of Americans were opposed to any intervention. That opposition, plus the British parliament’s rejection, was a major factor in why Obama backed down then on his proposed military strikes during September 2013. But after the latest videos showing two American journalists being brutally slain, US public opinion, according to recent polls, is now strongly in favour of Obama’s anti-ISIS bombing coalition; not just operating in Iraq, but more significantly, the American public wants the coalition to go after ISIS inside Syria too. Thus, where the chemical weapons horror last year failed to convince the American public to give its approval for US air strikes in Syria, the beheading of American hostages has succeeded. For Washington and its close London ally, the British public is a crucial constituency to also win over. It seems more than a coincidence that ISIS has now carried out the same sickening execution of a British national as it did with the two Americans. President Obama said after the videoed slaying of Briton David Haines that the US “stands shoulder-to-shoulder” with the British people. The question is this: are these shocking executions, with their highly stylised graphic videos, being used to manipulate public consent for Western military intervention in Syria? In that case, ISIS is not acting in some apparent rogue fashion, turning on its Western intelligence masters, but rather it is obeying orders as usual as part of a macabre charade to facilitate Western military intervention. Once again, what we are seeing is a variation of “humanitarian pretext” to pave the way for the covert, ulterior agenda of Western-orchestrated regime change in foreign countries. That ploy was used previously by NATO forces in former Yugoslavia at the end of the 1990s and more recently in Libya during 2011. It is well documented that ISIS, IS or ISIL, is a terror network created by US, British and Saudi military intelligence going back to the early years of the Iraq War beginning in 2003, when the group played a vital role in fomenting sectarian strife in Iraq to the advantage of the Western occupying armies.The network has antecedents in Western collusion with radical Islamist mercenaries in Afghanistan during the 1980s against the former Soviet Union, which led to the formation of Al Qaeda, and also in Chechnya in the mid-1990s. ISIS leader Abu Bakr Baghdadi is known to be a US intelligence asset, according to a former senior Al Qaeda operative, Nabil Naim, among other sources. Former CIA personnel have also disclosed that ISIS, like Al Qaeda, was set up to further geopolitical goals for Washington and its allies in the Middle East. These goals include regime change in target countries, such as Syria, and perpetuating the money-spinning American military-industrial complex by creating an endless security threat. Officially, the network may be a proscribed terror organization and “an enemy of the state”. But in the underworld of black operations, ISIS is a covert instrument of US government and corporate interests. Given the strategic importance of the US-led regime-change objective in Syria – and in particular the importance of obtaining public support for military intervention in that country – it is not beyond the realm of possibility that the ISIS network is carrying out beheadings of Western citizens on the orders of its handlers in the CIA and Britain’s MI6. Perhaps even, the outward political leadership in Washington and London, Obama and Cameron, are unaware of their own dark forces at work, which gives their public reactions of indignation an air of authenticity and credibility. Indeed, the evident political consequences from the latest execution of Briton David Haines and Americans Jim Foley and Steven Sotloff are strongly indicative of a Western psychological operation. That makes Washington and London culpable of murdering their own citizens for geopolitical expediency. These victims are sacrificial lambs in the foulest sense.

Tags: ISIS Finian Cunningham Originally from Belfast, Ireland, Finian Cunningham (born 1963) is a prominent expert in international affairs. The author and media commentator was expelled from Bahrain in June 2011 for his critical journalism in which he highlighted human rights violations by the Western-backed regime. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in journalism. He is also a musician and songwriter. For many years, he worked as an editor and writer in the mainstream news media, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. He is now based in East Africa where he is writing a book on Bahrain and the Arab Spring.He co-hosts a weekly current affairs programme, Sunday at 3pm GMT on Bandung Radio. Finian Cunningham is a frequent contributor to international media, including PRESS TV and nsnbc, where he began contributing in 2012. Finian CUNNINGHAM Why London Fears Scottish Independence NATO Sabotage on Order for Ukraine Ceasefire Putin, not Ukraine, is Vexing America Western Doublethink on Blind Path to War US General Dempsey Another Victim of the American Gulag http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/09/16/isis-beheadings-on-cue-from-washington-and-london.html

US envoy to Ukraine caught posting fake images on Twitter

Published time: September 16, 2014 02:22
Edited time: September 16, 2014 04:23

Get short URL

Download video ttp://rt.com/news/187992-ukraine-drills-pyatt-fail/

US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt has been caught posting unverified images on his Twitter feed Monday, as he was showing off the ongoing US-Kiev military exercises in Ukraine.

Ambassador Pyatt first uploaded a picture of US and Ukrainian troops, which he said was taken in the morning at the military exercises in western Ukraine. Internet users quickly pointed out that the photo had already beenpublished as early as July 31.

Someone’s Already Fighting ISIS: The Syrian Arab Army

By Tony Cartalucci

Global Research, September 15, 2014

New Eastern Outlook

Region: Middle East & North Africa

Theme: US NATO War Agenda

In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?

 34 

  11  0 

  60

Since 2011, the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) has waged a relentless war within Syrian territory against what it has said from the very beginning was an invasion of heavily armed, foreign-backed sectarian extremists. In retrospect, the transparently ludicrous nature of articles like the Guardian’s “Syria’s rebels unite to oust Assad and push for democracy” is self-evident. The article would lay out Syria’s claims side by side with the West’s narrative by stating:

In one of the fiercest clashes of the insurrection, Syrian troops finally took control of the town of Rastan after five days of intense fighting with army defectors who sided with protesters. Syrian authorities said they were fighting armed terrorist gangs.

In retrospect, and upon examining the obvious lay of Syria’s battlefields today, it is clear Syrian authorities were right.

Shortly after NATO carried out successful “regime change” in Libya in 2011 under the false pretext of a “humanitarian intervention,” sectarian-driven mercenaries it armed, funded, and provided air cover for in Libya began steadily streaming into Syria via its northern border with NATO-member Turkey.

Terrorists from the US State Department designated terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) officially made contact with terrorists fighting in Syria to offer them weapons, cash, training, and fighters. The London Telegraph would report in their article, “Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group,” that:

The meetings came as a sign of a growing ties between Libya’s fledgling government and the Syrian opposition. The Daily Telegraph on Saturday revealed that the new Libyan authorities had offered money and weapons to the growing insurgency against Bashar al-Assad. 

Mr Belhaj also discussed sending Libyan fighters to train troops, the source said.

Indeed, at the highest levels, even as far back as 2011-2012, the so-called “moderate rebels” were entwined with Al Qaeda, vindicating the Syrian government’s statements regarding its struggle against foreign-backed terrorism, not a “pro-democracy uprising.”

Today, the West has expunged all rhetoric regarding “pro-democracy,” with sectarian extremism clearly driving militancy across both sides of Syria’s borders with Lebanon and Iraq. Instead, the West has been resigned to attempts in differentiating between groups like Al Qaeda’s al Nusra franchise and its Islamic State (ISIS) counterparts – claiming the latter must be addressed more urgently, even at the cost of cooperating with the former - yet another US State Department designated terrorist organization.

Syria’s Long War  

And while the fierce fighting in Syria may have began in 2011, the war on foreign-backed sectarian extremism began a generation ago. From 1976 to 1982, Syrian President Bashar al Assad’s father, Hafez al-Assad, waged war on the heavily militarized Muslim Brotherhood. Upon breaking the back of the organization in Syria, it fled and was later reconstituted by the United States and Saudi Arabia into what would become Al Qaeda in the mountains of Afghanistan to fight the Soviet Union.

In the US Army’s West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) 2008 report titled, “Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa’ida’s Road In and Out of Iraq,” it stated unequivocally that (emphasis added):

During the first half of the 1980s the role of foreign fighters in Afghanistan was negligible and was largely  un‐noticed by outside observers. The flow of volunteers from the Arab heartland countries was just a trickle in the early 1980s, though there were more significant links between the mujahidin and Central Asian Muslims—especially Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Kazakhs. Individuals like the above‐mentioned Abu’l‐Walid were recruited in the early years via ad hoc outreach campaigns initiated from within Afghanistan, but by 1984, the resources being poured into the conflict by other countries—especially Saudi Arabia and the United States—had become much greater, as had the effectiveness and sophistication of the recruitment efforts. Only then did foreign observers begin to remark on the presence of outside volunteers. 

The repression of Islamist movements in the Middle East contributed to the acceleration of Arab fighters leaving for Afghanistan. One important process was the Syrian regime of Hafez Assad’s brutal campaign against the Jihadi movement in Syria, led by the “Fighting Vanguard” (al‐Tali’a al‐Muqatila) of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. The crackdown initiated an exodus of Vanguard militants to neighboring Arab states. By 1984, large numbers of these men began making their way from exile in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Jordan toward southeastern Afghanistan to fight the Soviets.

Despite terms like “repression” and “brutal campaign,” it is clear that the CTC is referring to heavily armed, militarized, extremist movements the US itself has allegedly waged “repressive, brutal” campaigns against across the planet, including in neighboring Iraq. It is also clear that Syria has been fighting sectarian extremism for decades, with the current protracted violence simply being the latest chapter. It is also clear that the United States and Saudi Arabia have, admittedly so, been propping up regional extremism in the form of both the Muslim Brotherhood and its various armed factions, as well as Al Qaeda, and now most recently, ISIS.

Syria is battling a long war against proxy imperialism brought upon it through heavily armed terrorists who serve both as a mercenary force, as well as a pretext, if all else fails, for its state-sponsors to intervene directly to stop widespread chaos of their own design.

There is Only One Logical Ally in the War on ISIS 

If the West was truly interested in fighting ISIS, it can find only one ally in the region – the Syrian Arab Army that has fought ISIS and its affiliates fiercely since 2011, and its predecessors for decades.

That the West instead proposes further arming and funding so-called “moderates” from which ISIS, Al Nusra and an innumerable amount of other extremist factions have risen from exposes a lack of sincerity and in fact, utter duplicity amidst its intentions in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. It is a geopolitical arsonist seeking to extinguish the flames of its crime by emptying a barrel of gasoline directly upon the raging inferno.

Indeed, since 2011, the so-called “moderates” of the “Free Syrian Army” were openly collaborating with LIFG, a US designated terrorist organization. It would also be confirmed that the “Free Syrian Army” was fighting alongside (if not entirely a component of) Al Qaeda’s al Nusra franchise all throughout territory now allegedly held by ISIS. ISIS in fact did not mutate from idealistic moderates – only the narrative covering up the existence and extent of ISIS’ foreign-backed operation in Syria and now in Iraq and Lebanon has changed. From the very beginning, and in fact, proceeding the ongoing war in Syria, a sectarian driven, genocidal mercenary force designed for ravaging the entire region on behalf of the US and its regional partners was the stated plan as early as 2007.

Veteran journalist and Pulitzer Prize-winner Seymour Hersh warned in a prophetic 2007 New Yorker article titled, “The Redirection Is the Administration’s new policy benefitting our enemies in the war on terrorism?” that (emphasis added):

To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

It can no longer be denied that the West is the cause of, not the solution for, the ongoing chaos now slowly burning the entire Middle East and beyond.

It can also not be denied that the only true force in the region fighting Al Qaeda and the myriad of aliases it is operating under, is the Syrian government with the backing of its allies in Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, and even as far as Russia. For the West to pose as “fighting” ISIS by creating a coalition consisting of the very nations sponsoring the terrorist organization, illustrates the audacity afforded to the West by its immense unwarranted power and influence – power and influence that must be ultimately reckoned with in order to truly resolve the violence in the Middle East and prevent similar chaos from being instigated elsewhere around the world.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.  First  published by New Eastern Outlook

MH17: An Internationally Sanctioned Cover-Up Orchestrated by US and UK

EDITOR'S CHOICE | 15.09.2014 | 22:13

Most, if not all global mass media as well as the Alternate media expressed similar sentiments and demanded that the perpetrators be brought to justice. Six weeks have passed since July 17, 2014 when the dastardly crime was committed and we are no nearer from the truth in so far as official pronouncements are concerned. In fact, lies and propaganda were intensified to mislead and divert public attention from the glaring irrefutable fact that the US and UK are ultimately responsible for the mass murder. This, we will show in due course below. First, we must expose the elaborate cover-up starting with the release of the Preliminary Report in Malaysia on the 10th of September, 2014. Why do I say that there is an internationally sanctioned cover-up? Let’s recap what the world leaders, with blood on their hands had to say on the 18th July, 2014. This is how The Independent (a UK newspaper) reported and we quote: World leaders are demanding an international investigation into the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine, which killed all 298 people on board. In a statement on Friday, US President Barack Obama warned that the “eyes of the world [are] on eastern Ukraine.” Calling for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine, Obama demanded a credible investigation into the incident. “We’re going to make sure that truth gets out,” he said, having called the crash a “terrible tragedy” on Thursday evening. Earlier in the day, Prime Minister David Cameron had described the air disaster as“absolutely appalling, shocking [and] horrific” and called for thoseresponsible “to be held to account” after chairing a meeting of the Government’s Cobra emergency committee. Prior to Obama’s statement on Friday afternoon, the United Nations (UN) Security Council backed a British-drafted statement calling for a “full, thorough and independent international investigation”, during an emergency meetingpreceded by a moment’s silence for those killed in the crash. Earlier on Friday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said it “is critical thatthere be a full, credible, and unimpeded international investigation as quickly as possible”. He told a news conference it was “vital that no evidence be tampered with in any way and that all potential evidence and remains at the crash site are undisturbed”. German Chancellor Angela Merkel echoed the call for an independent investigation into the crash to be started as quickly as possible, telling a news conference in Berlin: “There are many indications that the plane was shot down, so we have to take things very seriously.” The Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk described the downing of the plane as an “international crime” and a “war against the world” as he called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council. “All lines have been crossed,” he added. To All Malaysians, especially the Malaysian government and the families of the victims, am I right in saying that in plain and simple English, the quoted passages above suggests that any independent investigation must lead to the identification of the perpetrators so that they would be prosecuted for their crimes. Nothing short of a definitive finding of fact as to who is guilty of this crime is but a heinous cover-up of the mass murder! Any independent investigation must establish the perpetrators, the criminal liability and responsibility of any state, and if more than one state or entity are involved, to apportion such criminal liability. If any report that emanates from the present investigation falls short of this benchmark, it is nothing more than a white wash and a cover-up. The Malaysian Prime Minister and the Attorney-General have publicly declared and assured the Malaysian public and the world that the perpetrators would be prosecuted for the crime. Nothing less would suffice! What is most startling is that within hours of the crash, a global propaganda campaign was mounted against Russia and President Putin which even influenced the Malaysian mass media which uncritically echoed this deceitful propaganda. For the record, Future Fast-Forward has been in the forefront in Malaysia exposing this propaganda and challenged the Malaysian mass media that if they cannot come up with irrefutable evidence showing that President Putin and Russia were responsible, they should shut up, bow in shame and apologise publicly to President Putin and Russia. Till to date, those in Malaysia responsible for the falsehoods have yet to issue any apology. . Leading members of the US regime, past and present have the audacity to point fingers at President Putin, the Russian Federation and the Ukrainian Resistance to the Kievw Junta as being responsible for this heinous crime. We quote from The Independent again: US senator John McCain also warned that there will be “hell to pay” if theRussian military or separatists are deemed to have had any involvement in the ‘incident’. In a television interview, the former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested the plane could have been shot by Russian-backed separatists, and said action was needed to “put [Vladimir] Putin on notice that he has gone too far and we are not going to stand idly by”. She told PBS news: “There does seem to be some growing awareness that it probably had to be Russian insurgents. How we determine that will require some forensics, but then if there is evidence pointing in that direction, the equipment had to have come from Russia. What more the Russians may or may not have done, we don’t know.” These two war criminals have to date nothing to show for their accusations. But, let us give them the benefit of doubt that they do have the evidence. In the circumstances, these two war criminals together with President Obama and Secretary of State  John Kerry should (and they have the means and capabilities) to set up a parallel “independent investigation” to evaluate their dastardly accusations against President Putin and Russia. Justice demands that if these war criminals have such irrefutable evidence, they owe the world a duty to disclose the evidence and come clean that they are in no way involved in this heinous crime and bring those involved to justice since they have demanded accountability. Having demanded accountability from others, it is only right that they account to the world and the families of the victims for their blatant accusations and assist Malaysia in prosecuting the criminals responsible for this heinous crime. But, the opposite is the case. When Russia came out with evidence that the plane was tailed by Ukrainian fighter planes and MH17 was diverted and that at the critical moment of the downing of MH17, an American satellite was monitoring the entire area, the global mass media controlled by the Zionist Anglo-American establishment fell silent. How very convenient. Now the bombshell! Given the above circumstances, one would have thought that the current so-called independent investigation headed by the Netherlands would have as its primary objective to identify the perpetrators and the country responsible for this heinous crime, given the fact that members of the US regime, past and present (as quoted above) have accused President Putin and therefore the evidence in support are allegedly available it should not be a problem for this investigation to proceed accordingly. Right??? Wrong!!!! The powers that be have decided otherwise and have used a particular provision in the enabling international convention to avoid this responsibility. To avoid any misunderstanding, let me state here categorically that there is absolutely no evidence of any culpability on the part of President Putin, Russia and/or the Ukrainian Resistance. On the contrary, the evidence points decisively towards the Kiev Junta installed by the US, UK and NATO. It follows that a massive cover-up is needed. The cover-up is needed because if the truth is out that the US, UK and NATO together with the Kiev Junta are involved in this mass murder, the entire pretext for a war against Russia and thereafter the entire Eurasia Theatre would unravel and the blowback would be such that Obama may well be impeached following demands from the American people. David Cameron would have to resign forthwith which would accelerate the secession of Scotland from the  “United Kingdom” and the dreams of the War Party of a “New Eastern Front” with Poland as the springboard would collapse immediately. So what is this provision that allows the perpetrators with the connivance of the Netherlands to avoid being investigated? It is paragraph 31 of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) Annex 13 which provides that the sole objective of: “…this investigation is the prevention of similar accidents and incidents. It is not the purpose of this activity to apportion blame or liability in respect of any party.” I am not stating this with hindsight as I am on record in my interviews and articles that I have written as well as emails sent out, that I have held back my investigations and analyses so as to give these criminals enough rope to hang themselves for in the process of covering-up, they would by their actions show to the world their complicity. I have written records and witnesses to the above assertion and I dare challenge anyone to contradict me on this assertion. The above cited provision is an insult to the victims and the families of the victims. This is a mass murder. It is not an accident. It is also not a mere incident that could be prevented in the future. War criminals and states that commit war crimes such as US, UK, France etc. have been committing such crimes in the past and have not been brought to account in any international tribunal. Only in Malaysia, in the present century, have the courage of its conviction to convict Bush, Blair etc. for their war crimes in Iraq and the rump state of Israel for the war crimes and genocide against the Palestinians! Shame to the ICAO! Shame to President Obama! Shame to Secretary of State, John Kerry! Shame to Prime Minister David Cameron! Shame to former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton! Shame to Senator John McCain! How much more blood do they wish to be on their hands? Have no illusions, for there will be a massive blowback for their connivance and conspiracy to commit this heinous crime and for the cover-up. The mere thought (which was previously dismissed as a fanciful dream) of Scotland seceding has sent shock waves to the ruling war party in England. It was a three-hundred-year myth that Scotland and Wales needed England to survive. The Scots and the Welsh fell for it hook, line and sinker but no more. The Empire is dead, and there will be no longer the refrain, “the King is dead, long live the King!” It is dead for good, even if in the event the Scots change their minds and vote to remain in the UK. The writing is on the wall. Likewise, for “Uncle Sam”! When the former chief economist of President Obama calls for the “dethronement of the „King Dollar‟ ”, the American Empire is in its death throes! For my American friends, you need not fear the demise of the Empire for your country when established by the founding fathers never envisaged an empire, having fought against one at great costs. Hold close to your hearts the Farewell Address of President George Washington and rebuild your once great Republic from the ashes of the “Imperial Anglo-American Empire”. Wake up to the fact that for over a century you have been hoodwinked and brainwashed by the Zionist Anglo establishment in the City of London to fight and die for “Mother England” for she had never forgiven America for the insult and humiliation of losing the “Imperial Crown of America”, the most prized possession of Mother England. Break free from such clutches! The people of America must help Malaysia and Malaysians to expose this heinous crime and by so doing we would together prevent a potential war against Russia and thereafter against Eurasia. Americans must learn from their recent experience. Have you not fought enough wars? How many thousands of your young men and women must die for another nation’s interest? By Matthias Chang, Future Fast Forward Global Research http://www.globalresearch.ca/malaysian-airlines-mh17-preliminary-report-an-internationally-sanctioned-cover-up-orchestrated-by-the-us-and-britain/5401099 The 4th MediaAll

Tags: Malaysia