Tuesday, March 25, 2014

777 Malaysia Airlines: 20 ingénieurs liés à la défense US à bord.

Il y avait donc vingt employés du groupe Freescale à bord du Boeing
777 de la Malaysia Airlines. Ils étaient en route pour une réunion d'affaire

à Pékin. C'est le PDG du groupe, Greg Loewe, qui l'a annoncé dans un

communiqué précisant que douze d'entre eux étaient  de nationalité

malaisienne, huit de nationalité chinoise Freescale Semiconductor est  une firme basée à Austin.  Elle dispose d'une équipe de spécialistes dédiée à l'appui aux forces de défense. Les produits commerciaux de Freescale couvrent divers secteurs :

  • Les Communications sur le champ de bataille
  • L'avionique
  • Les bandes radar HF par L et  S
  •  Le guidage des missiles
  •  La guerre électronique
  •  L'identification, ami ou ennemi (IFF )
Personne n'en parle dans les media mainstream. Est-on là au coeur  des
raisons de cette disparition ? il paraît évident que ce ne sont pas des

laveurs de vitres  qui faisaient  ce voyage mais des ingénieurs de haut

niveau.

Alors ?Les chroniques de Rorschach approfondissent ainsi le sujet: Concernant le mystère du vol MH370, deux informations importantes n'ont pas été diffusées.
  1. A l'aide de l'armement électronique d'aujourd'hui, un avion peut sembler disparaître
  2. Les vingt passagers de Freesacle sont liés à des contractants US de la Défense dans le domaine de l'armement électronique 'high tech'.  Les capacités de la guerre électronique comprennent des armes qui permettentde cacher des avions. Cet armement électronique est non seulement  disponible, il est d'ores et déjà en cours de déploiement. A-t-il été utilisé pour masquer ou camoufler l'avion disparu ? Mais voyons ce que sont ces nouvelles techniques: De nouvelles armes électroniques permettent le brouillage , l'aveuglement , l'assourdissement et plus encore, de sorte qu'un avion pourrait disparaître des radars de détection tandis que les systèmes de sécurité ne seraient pas activés . Au niveau du radar les stratégies de
  • contre-mesures électroniques basiques utilisées dans la guerre électronique sont :
  • les interférences radar
  • la modification des cibles
  •  la modification des propriétés électriques de l'air .
Par exemple, un rapport d'évaluation du renseignement américain a conclu
qu'une attaque israélienne contre l'Iran irait bien au-delà des frappes

aériennes avec des avions de combat et verrait probablement le déploiement

d'armes électroniques contre le réseau électrique, l'Internet, les réseaux

de téléphonie mobile ainsi que les fréquences d'urgence utilisées par les
premiers secours en Iran.

Autre exemple, Israël a développé une arme capable d'imiter un signal de
maintenance qui commande au réseau des portables de " se mettre en veille "

stoppant ainsi efficacement les transmissions.

En 2007, l'armée syrienne a obtenu un avant-goût de cette guerre quand  les
radars de défense aérienne du pays ont étés leurrés par les forces

Israéliennes. Dans un premier temps, elles ont fait en sorte qu'ils ne

montrent aucun avion dans le ciel puis l'instant d'après, elles ont fait en
sorte que les radars montrent des centaines d'avions.
L'année dernière, il a été annoncé que la nouvelle technologie de la
furtivité des avions les rend invisible non seulement au radar mais
également à l'oeil humain à la manière d'une cape d'invisibilité.

A-t-on à faire à un détournement fait pour éliminer ou capturer ces

cerveaux ?

Ce matin un nouvel élement, révélé par le Nouvel Obs, rend cette thèse
possible :

Deux sources proches de l'enquête ont indiqué à Reuters que des données
radar suggèrent que le vol MH370, qui a disparu samedi sans laisser de

traces, a été délibérément orienté vers les îles Andaman.

Un avion non identifié qui pourrait être le Boeing 777 en question suivait
un cap défini par des "waypoints", ce qui suppose que quelqu'un ayant des

compétences en matière de pilotage se trouvait aux commandes lorsqu'il a été

repéré pour la dernière fois par des radars militaires au large de la côte
nord-ouest de la Malaisie, dit-on de mêmes sources.

Tout ceci n'est-il pas su depuis longtemps par les différents gouvernements? Pourquoi perdre du temps à chercher des débris qui n'existent pas ?
Y-a-t-il des négociations secrètes ?

A-t-on sacrifié 219 passagers pour éliminer 20 savants ? Ou a-t-on enlevé 20
cerveaux pour utiliser leurs connaissances ?

Que sont devenus les autres passagers ?
Un simple épisode de la grande guerre technologique ?
Qui est à la manoeuvre ?
Est-ce une manière, après l'attentat de la gare de Kunming qui avait fait 30
morts et 133 blessés, de dire à la Chine de se tenir à l'écart du conflit

US-Russie ? Sous-entendu : " On a les possibilités de vous empoisonner la

vie à peu de frais... "

Interrogeons-nous puisqu'on a demandé aux internautes de chercher des débris
sur la mer.

Mais pas que sur la mer, sur le grand flot d'internet, bien des indices aussi posent question. SOURCES :

http://www.electronique.biz/index.php/economie/vie-de-la-profession/item/502






Eine mutige LINKE, ein wichtiges Mitglied des Bundestages ist Sevim Dagdelen, unterstützen wir sie!

Die Hysterie scheint grenzenlos, aber bewahren wir einen kühlen Kopf. In Wirklichkeit rudert der Westen doch zurück. Je mehr sie in die Defensive geraten, je aggressiver ist ihr Auftreten, je schärfer und inhumaner ihre Drohgebärden. Wir müssen gegen die Meinungsmache und vor allem Meinungsmacht der Mainstreammedien auftreten. Sevim Dagdelen von den LINKEN kämpft einen unterstützenswerten Kampf dafür in ihren eigenen Reihen, wir müssen ihr Engagement als Friedensmenschen bekannt machen und unterstützen
Linken-Politikerin Sevim Dagdelen im Interview bei Russia Today, Screenshot: youtube/RussiaToday / Screenshot: youtube/RussiaTodayDie Süddeutsche schreibt am:18.03.2014 "So wird das nichts mit Rot-Rot-Grün: Linke Bundestagsabgeordnete wie Sevim Dağdelen torpedieren mit ihrer strikten Pro-Putin-Haltung Gespräche mit SPD und Grünen. Die Fraktionsspitze kann oder will sie nicht einfangen." sueddeutsche.de

Böse "Sozis" hetzen gegen konsequente Kriegsgegnerin bei den LINKEN, aber  MDB Sevim Dagdelen hält  stand!

Die Süddeutsche Zeitung diffamiert, man  lerne aber gegen den Strich lesen und erkenne, dass Sevim Dagdelen mutig  eine wichtige, aufklärerische  Aufgabe erfüllt:


"Dağdelen mischt kräftig in Sachen Ukraine und Krim-Konflikt mit. Sie ist so etwas wie Putins U-Boot im deutschen Parlament. Jegliche Kritik am russischen Staatschef, der gerade die Krim annektiert, weist sie entschieden zurück.
Im russischen Propagandasender Russia Today ist sie regelmäßiger Gesprächsgast. Dort erklärt sie immer wieder, dass die Europäische Union, die Bundesregierung und die Nato den Sturz des Janukowitsch-Regimes mit Hilfe von Faschisten in der Ukraine betrieben hätten. Ist Dağdelen im Bild, werden rechts neben ihr Videos eingeblendet. Darin ist zu sehen, wie ukrainische Sicherheitskräfte von Demonstranten verprügelt werden.
In Gastkommentaren etwa für die Junge Welt geißelt Dağdelen die Rolle der zum Teil mit Faschisten besetzten Übergangsregierung in der Ukraine. Den grassierenden Nationalismus in Russland aber oder Putins Eskalationsstrategie erwähnt sie mit keinem Wort.

Zu Dağdelens Lieblingswörtern gehört "Krieg". Bundespräsident Joachim Gauck nennt sie einen "Kriegstreiber". Eine Bundestagskommission, in der über eine Neuordnung der Parlamentsrechte bei Auslandseinsätzen der Bundeswehr beraten werden soll, ist in ihren Augen eine "Kriegskommission" .
Die Grünen haben jüngst eine Fotomontage in die digitale Welt gesetzt, auf der Linken-Fraktionsvize Sahra Wagenknecht vor Soldaten zu sehen ist. Darüber der Satz: "Jetzt neu: Linkspartei erstmals für Auslandseinsätze".Dağdelen kommentiert das auf Twitter mit den Worten: "Wie die CDU-Propaganda aus dem Kalten Krieg. #Grüne auf dem Weg nach rechts außen, mit neuer Kalter Kriegspropaganda."
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/linke-und-spd-in-der-krim-krise-putins-anwaeltin-im-bundestag-1.1916061
Dağdelen twittert und postet ihre Positionen derart penetrant in die Welt, dass sie von manchen schon als Wortführerin der Linken im Bundestag in Sachen Ukraine wahrgenommen wird. Petra Sitte platzt da fast der Kragen: "Frau Dağdelen ist keine Wortführerin", zischt sie.
Es sei Konsens in der Fraktion, dass die Mobilmachung der Ukraine wenig hilfreich sei. Und Sanktionen gegen Russland abgelehnt würden. Sie wünsche sich aber, dass die Debatte sachlich geführt werde, sagt Sitte. "Das gilt für Frau Dağdelen wie für jedes andere Mitglied unserer Fraktion." Und: "Frau Dağdelen ist an der Stelle nicht mein Maßstab."
So deutlich hat bisher noch niemand aus der Linken Dağdelen in ihre Schranken gewiesen. Stören wird Dağdelen das allem Anschein nach nicht. Genau so wenig wie ihre Mitstreiter Ulla Jelpke und Wolfgang Gehrcke, die sich ähnlich wie Dağdelen äußern.
Das wiederum kann all denen nicht passen, die sich seit der Bundestagswahl verstärkt um gute Kontakte zwischen Linken, Grünen und der SPD bemühen. Nach der Bundestagswahl 2017 soll ein Linksbündnis rechnerisch, vor allem aber inhaltlich eine realistische Chance haben. Erste Gesprächsfäden wurden aufgenommen, die Parteispitzen von Grünen und Linken haben sich bereits getroffen.
Zwischen SPD und Linken ist das etwas schwieriger, weil beide Seiten ihre Rollen in Regierung und Opposition wahren wollen. Da gibt es bisher nur unregelmäßig informelle Treffen auf Ebene der Abgeordneten, etwa in der Kneipe "Walden" in Prenzlauer Berg. Code-Wort "R2G" oder auch "Walden-Connection".

Anti War and Anti-Fascist Strategies To Be Put on The Agenda!

 The Green's Böll Foundation wants  Gender-Equality -  Women want Peace!  Women want their equal rights and needs to be respected.

Women are  not  to be fooled for long , they are capable to think in political terms, they can make their voices heard.

Almost one hundred years ago, professional women, advocats of the suffrage for women, assembled at the Hague and came  out strongly against  the worst enemy of humanity, which is war. Four years later  women met again in Zurich and founded WILPF = "Women's International League For Peace and Freedom". They wanted to join their efforts and to make women's voices heard against any new war preparations. They called for total and universal disarmament and for the transformation of their respective societies towards a more just social order. They thought this to be a pre-condition for preventing further wars.

In 2014 European  women met again in Berlin, they met the weekend before, 15 years ago, the first European war scenario started against former Jugoslavia. The Böll framework does not allow   commemorating the 78 days lasting bombardment of the former Balkan republic. War hysteria against Russia is at its hight.The Green party and their foundation will not condemn the ongoing war efforts.
 The hysteria of the media, that blame Russia for what happened in the Ukraine and for  the war tensions in the air is heavily supported by the Böll Foundation at this moment.

The Böll Foundation's siege in the heart of Berlin is  situated right next to the Ukrainian embassy. The day before their gathering Joschka Fischer gave a talk and George Soros, too.

The "world leaders" represent  needs  completely contradictory to those of the majority of European women. Sonia Mitralia from Greece spoke at the Gunda Werner/Böll/ Wilpf conference about fascist tendencies in her country, connected to the neoliberal dictate of the EU Troika. She warned against the same wave that might  arrive sooner  or later in other European countries. But her warning went without much ado and without being discussed thoroughly, yet.

Anti war and anti-fascist strategies were not on the agenda.

Preparing for the hundredth anniversary of the oldest women's peace organization must go beyond fundraising activities.  The watchword is essential, the content counts. What are the funds to be used for? Who will be invited as keynote speakers for the Hague next year? What will it cost for members to participate? And under what title will the birthday party take place. All this has yet to be evaluated.
We must see to it, that it that we grass routes women define the agenda.

Can PEACE-WILPF and Green-Böll Wariors Go Together?

Wilpf-Europe and "Gunda Werner Institute" held a joint conference last weekend in Berlin at the  prestigious siege of  the Heinrich Böll-Foundation, Schumannstraße 8, in Berlin Mitte.

Heinrich Böll (1917-1985) a notable German postwar novelist received the Nobel Prize for literature in 1972. He was active in the enormous peace movement of the eighties of last century.
But Are the German Greens an anti-war party today?
The world wide web has  the following answer:

"German Green Party campaigns for war

By Christoph Dreier 
22 March 2014
The German government’s confrontational approach towards Russia is supported by all parties represented in the federal parliament. But none are doing so as aggressively and hysterically as the Greens.
Fifteen years ago, the Greens jointly oversaw the first foreign deployment of the German army since World War II in NATO’s war against Yugoslavia. Now they are supporting fascist forces in Ukraine and foaming with war propaganda against Russia. On the television programme “Menschen bei Maischberger” there was virtually nothing to differentiate Green Party politician Werner Schulz from the president of the revanchist League of Exiles (BdV) Erika Steinbach on this issue.
Schulz described Russian President Vladimir Putin as a “criminal,” “aggressor,” and “war-monger,” who represented an “expansionist nationalism.” Because Putin was an “unscrupulous power politician,” the situation was more dangerous today than in the Cold War.
Schulz received special praise from Steinbach when he questioned the legitimacy of Russia’s claim to Crimea by referring to the deportation of Crimea’s Tatars under the Stalinist regime 70 years ago as the cause of ethnic Russians being in the majority. It was not actually a state which broke apart when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, but Europe’s last colonial empire had fallen, according to Schulz. Putin’s new colonialism had to be countered by the eastward expansion of the NATO alliance.
In an interview with Deutsche Welle at the beginning of March, Schulz explicitly spoke out in favour of using military threats over the Ukraine conflict. “Ultimately, the only really effective method is the guarantee of assistance,” the European Parliament deputy said. “It is fully in conformity with international law that these countries are given a guarantee that their territorial integrity will be maintained. And this will also warn Russia of its limits.”
Whenever voices are raised in the German media and by politicians, who, while supporting the aims of German imperialism, call for diplomatic activity or verbal de-escalation, Green Party propagandists respond with extreme aggression."

... the Greens have no qualms about defending the fascist party Svoboda, whose sister party in Germany, the NPD, the Greens wish to ban. Svoboda formed part of the shock troops who contributed to the escalation of violence on the Maidan, and is represented in the new government, which is recognised by the German government, with six cabinet members and three ministers.
Green Party chairwoman Katrin Göring-Eckhardt defended Svoboda during a recent debate in the German parliament in an angry speech. The call from Svoboda leader Oleg Tyagnibok, “grab your arms, fight the Russkies, the Germans, the yids and other undesirables,” was already 10 years old and therefore could not help in understanding the current situation, claimed Göring-Eckhardt. Instead one had to ask, “Why was it that right-wing populists were invited from across Europe to monitor the vote in Crimea?”
Svoboda’s ministers did not have the upper hand in the Ukrainian government, she went on. Therefore there was no reason to take action. “Democracy and freedom in the Ukrainian constitution would certainly be over in that case.”
This defence of, and downplaying of fascists is in direct contradiction with the Greens’ own sources. In November, Kyryl Savin, head in Kiev of the Heinrich Böll foundation—the Greens’ think tank—commented: “unfortunately the right and right-wing radicals dominated the rhetoric among the protesters.” At the same time, according to Savin, “many of our partners in civil society” had taken part in the demonstrations.
The foundation was actively involved in the organisation of the demonstrations from the beginning. Leading Green politicians like Harms and parliamentary deputy Marieluise Beck travelled to Kiev on numerous occasions to participate in the Maidan protests and to exercise influence. The permanent presence of Svoboda leader Tyagnibok, who was hailed by leading representatives from the EU, and the German and US governments, was of no concern to them. Just this week the Heinrich Boll foundation hosted a discussion between billionaire speculator George Soros and former Green Party minister Joschka Fischer, who have declared their unanimity on all major questions regarding developments in Ukraine—in particular their support for the aggressive policy of the German government against Russia.
The cooperation with fascists and calls for war with Russia are the sharpest expressions to date of the rightward evolution of the Greens. In 1998, the former pacifists played a key role in mobilising their petty-bourgeois followers in support of the first intervention by the German army since the Second World War. At that time it was foreign minister Fischer who argued for war on the basis of preventing a repeat of Auschwitz. Since then the Greens have developed into the party that is the most aggressive advocate of military intervention.
During their time in government, they also supported the colonial campaign against Afghanistan. In the Libyan war, the Greens attacked the then Christian Democratic Union/Free Democratic Party government for not participating in the bombardment of the country. Last year, they were thestrongest advocates of military intervention in Syria.
This militarist foreign policy was connected from the outset with massive attacks on the working class in Germany. The association agreement with the EU, which the German government sought to enforce with the overthrow of Yanukovych, also plans major attacks on the wages and living standards of Ukrainian workers.
The Greens’ ruthless advocacy of the interests of German imperialism arises from the social and political roots of the party. More than any other, the Greens represent a privileged layer of the middle class and are extremely hostile to the demands of working people.
Figures like Schulz and Göring-Eckhardt played a central role in the restoration of capitalism in the GDR (East Germany). Both of them joined citizens’ movements in 1989 which would later come together to form Bündnis 90 (Alliance 90). Schulz sat personally at the round table discussions as a representative of the New Forum, collaborating closely with the Stalinist state party (SED) to prepare reunification and introduce capitalist property relations.
Their contempt for the social achievements of the working class in the GDR, expressed by Schulz’s description of the Soviet Union as a supposed colonial power, was coupled with the desire for career advancement in a reunified Germany. Bündnis 90 ultimately brought those elements of the movement together which emerged as the most hostile to the interests of the working class.
In 1993, they merged with the west German Greens, who for their part were representatives of a social layer which, after briefly flirting with Stalinism in its Maoist form in the 1970s, retained only its hatred of the working class while moving continuously to the right as its wealth grew.

MdB Sevim Dagdelen "Möglicher Regime-Change in der Ukraine mit der extremen Rechten" (Bundestagsdrucksache 18/863)

Regime-Change in der Ukraine mit der extremen Rechten

Regime-Change in der Ukraine mit der extremen Rechten

Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage von MdB Sevim Dagdelen

In ihrer Antwort auf die Kleine Anfrage von MdB Sevim Dagdelen "Möglicher Regime-Change in der Ukraine mit der extremen Rechten" (Bundestagsdrucksache 18/863) bestätigt die Bundesregierung, dass sie von den Umtrieben der Swoboda und ihres Führers Tjagnibok informiert ist. Aus der Antwort geht auch hervor, dass die Bundesregierung an diesem Partner, der wichtige Positionen in der Ukraine einnimmt, festhält


WILPF is neither "Pussy" nor "Riot"!

What Business does a Womens' Peace Organisation Have in Common with „Pussies and Riots“? NON!

WILPF women do neither want to be defined as sexobjects or playthings nor do they see their social role as „rioters“ even if they often have had to express their dissent with offically elected policy makers. Wilpfers see themselves as educators who have been   working for a peaceful transformation of their war ridden societies in an almost 100 year old struggle.

WILPF's struggle is based upon aims and principles. WILPF wants to abolish war forever and therefore works for a new economic world order based on justice. WILPF principles include tolerance and nonviolent procedures. As women and as peacemakers, Wilpfers  care to be treated as equal human beings who want their specific needs to be taken into consideration.

 Women's International League for Peace and Freedom came into organisational existence in 1919 in Zürich, Switzerland, while having been born out of an anti-war gathering of over 1000 women at the Hague in 1915. In the midst of a world wide slaughtering, which was later baptized World War I, they sent peace delegates to the waring parties. Diplomatic respect for the “enemy“ nation  and their leaders was a precondition to their very work.

Wilpfers of all ages cannot accept their sister being defined through male eyes as „Pussies“. Wilpf women will never accept being reduced to their sex organs. Professional women and mothers  do not allow being stigmatized and diminished as „pussies“ or pussycats, sexobject or any kind of male playthings.

The Russian „Punk Band“  „Pussy Riot“ acting with face masks and using violent methods, such as burning pictures of their elected president in public must be criticized for doing so. Their using symbols of violence like a speared guitars, their disrespect for the religious feelings of their compatriots and their aggressive and provocative behavior,  needs  to be exposed and not  to be applauded.

WILPF also must distanciate itself from "Pussy Riots" political background as being a spring off of the BBC and Western PR agencies, using their very strategies.
Their political aim, namely to "put shit" on „the altar“ and to their elected president cannot be aproved of, escpecially not in times of war threats under way.

See for reference:





Currently viewing the tag: "*Madeleine Rees"