Thursday, December 15, 2016

Aleppo Victory… US and its Crime Partners Suffer ‘Meltdown of Sanity’



Aleppo Victory… US and its Crime Partners Suffer ‘Meltdown of Sanity’
FINIAN CUNNINGHAM | 15.12.2016 | WORLD

The US and its terrorist-sponsoring partners are seeing their criminal regime-change project in ruins, as the Syrian army and its allies win a spectacular victory to retake the strategically important city of Aleppo.
Western governments and their flunkies at the UN are cynically, perversely decrying a «meltdown of humanity».
Closer to the truth is their own «meltdown of sanity». This is because the official Western narrative about the Syrian war is finally being exposed on a glaring scale.
The exposure for the whole world to see is one of a systematic, fake propaganda cover that concealed a criminal enterprise – an enterprise involving terrorist proxies, or fake moderate rebels, whom the Western governments have sponsored for the past six years in a conspiracy to overthrow the government of Syria. The gravity of this systematic crime committed by Washington and its various partners is now unfolding.
Unable to cope with their own cognitive dissonance over the criminality, the Western governments and their complicit corporate news media are resorting to outright denial and to compounding lies with even more lies.
Instead of dealing with the reality that Syrian state forces have recaptured Aleppo from brutal, illegally armed groups, which the West and its regional clients have bankrolled and armed, the West distorts the dramatic victory as the «fall of Aleppo». One report on American channel CNN even referred to the victorious Syrian army and its allies as «persecutors».
With typical unhinged emotion, US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power cited unverified reports of civilians being executed in Aleppo, and slammed Syria and its allies Russia and Iran for having «no shame». It is Power and her Western partners-in-crime, including top UN officials, who should be hanging their heads in shame.
Among the hysterical soundbites about alleged atrocities and slaughter being lobbed around this week was this from UN «humanitarian» official Jens Laerke who said Aleppo was seeing a «meltdown of humanity». Catchy words, but divorced from reality.
Western news media outlets were screaming headlines alleging summary executions of women and children by the Syrian army and its Russian, Iranian and Lebanese allies as they moved in to finally retake the whole of the northern city.
Outgoing UN chief Ban Ki-Moon talked in disparaging tones about an «uncompromising military victory», while his underlings Rupert Colville and Jan Egeland decried «hellish» conditions and «war crimes» committed by Syria and Russia.
The problem is that all these sensational, reckless assertions are based on unverified claims by anonymous «activists» or persons involved with militants – militants who are integrated with terror groups like Jaysh al Fatah, Jabhat al Nusra, Ahrar al Sham and Nour al din al Zenki. All of them affiliated with the internationally proscribed Al Qaeda terrorist network – which the Western governments claim to be at war with.
It truly is a grotesque revelation when Western governments and UN officials publicly spout propaganda on behalf of terrorist groups.
Samantha Power and her British counterpart at the UN Matthew Rycroft cited UN «reports» of 82 civilians being executed, including 11 women and 13 children, by the pro-government Syrian forces during the final hours of recapturing Aleppo. But the same UN «reports» were themselves based on unverified sources supposedly embedded among the terrorists. This is not reportage. It is simply recycling rumors aimed at saving the necks of terrorist groups.
The simple fact of the information coming from unverified sources did not stop the UN, Power, Rycroft and the raft of Western media outlets, including the Washington Post, CNN, Guardian, Independent, France 24 etc, presenting the claims as if they were fact.
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused Western governments and their dutiful, unquestioning news media of spreading «fake news» about the dramatic events in Syria this week. Lavrov pointed out that none of the alleged atrocities were acknowledged by independent humanitarian groups.
Syria’s ambassador to the UN Bashar al Jaafari also refuted the claims of atrocities that Western counterparts appeared to be so perplexed by.
Western governments and media outlets persisted in their gory fantasies despite abundant video footage that even they themselves were broadcasting which showed thousands of civilians calmly walking away from militant-held pockets of Aleppo towards the Syrian state forces. Is that the behavior of people who are being massacred, summarily executed, slaughtered?
One of the most absurd distortions was this from France 24. The state-owned broadcaster of one of the countries that has supplied weapons and propaganda cover to terrorists in Syria over the past six years described this week how «people in government-held areas of Aleppo were celebrating». Given that the Syrian government holds virtually all of Aleppo that means that the vast majority of Syrians were celebrating. Yet France 24 roils its words to contrive a false division between pro and anti-government populations.
The more logical and truthful depiction is that Syrian civilians are at last able to flee from terror gangs that have held them under siege. But in reporting that the whole false Western narrative about what has been going on in Aleppo and Syria for the past six years would implode like a house of cards.
Why aren’t the Western news media interviewing the tens of thousands of civilians who have now managed to flee from the defeated terrorist groups? Why don’t the Western media ask questions about the nature of their captivity? Such as, why could they not escape from militant-held eastern Aleppo until now? What do these civilians think of the Syrian army and its allies who have crushed the militants?
The curious, gaping absence of any testimonies carried by the Western media from the thousands of liberated civilians in Aleppo is mirrored by the same curious, gaping absence of testimonies from thousands of civilians liberated elsewhere in Syria by the army over the past year.
That’s because those civilians are telling media outlets which are willing to report, such as the Syrian state broadcaster SANA, as well as RT, Press TV and Al Manar, that their nightmare siege imposed by the Western-backed terrorists is over. If Western media outlets were to actually bother to conduct real journalism they would go into liberated areas of Aleppo and other towns and villages across Syria and report that life is returning to happy normalcy for these families and communities.
The truth is Aleppo was invaded by Western-backed mercenaries in July 2012, who turned the eastern side of the city into a den ruled under a reign of terror. A twisted, demented caliphate run by head-chopping Wahhabi jihadists was imposed. Like Syria as a whole, these mercenaries were sanitized in the West as «moderate, pro-democracy rebels» – albeit somehow supposedly «intermingled» with jihadi extremists.
If that were the case, then where are these supposed «moderates» now that the last den of the «rebels» in Aleppo has been routed?
The stark absence of «moderate», «pro-democracy», «Western-value-supporting rebels» emerging from the ruins of Aleppo is as stark as the absence of petrified civilians denouncing Syrian army «atrocities» or Russian «war crimes».
In one resounding moment this week, the Western narrative about Aleppo, and the Syrian war more generally, has collapsed in a pile of dust. No amount of denials and further distortions can hide the exposure of Western lies and propaganda fabrications.
So ironically, Western media outlets have recently whipped up the phenomenon of «fake news» in the context of trying to discredit Russia over alleged electoral interference in the US and Europe.
What Syria has demonstrated is that the real culprits of peddling false news, and more gravely false narratives, are the Western governments and their conceited, self-important news media.
Unable to deal with the unbearable truth of criminal complicity, the official West is displaying a meltdown of sanity.
Aleppo and Syria will one day emerge again from the present ruins. No such recovery from ruins will be made by the ignominious Western governments and their lying, criminally complicit media.


Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Trump Delivers on Promise to Mend Ties with Russia FINIAN CUNNINGHAM


Trump Delivers on Promise to Mend Ties with Russia
| 14.12.2016 | OPINION

Trump’s pick of oil industry chief Rex Tillerson as the next Secretary of State is an encouraging sign that the president-elect is indeed following through on campaign promises to mend bilateral ties with Russia.

But the war hawks within the Republican and Democrat parties could yet throw a spanner in the works over the nomination.
Immediately, the news of Tillerson’s nomination drew insinuations that the outcome was «more evidence» that Russia had interfered in the US election to sway the result for Trump over Democrat rival Hillary Clinton.
Sixty-four-old Rex Tillerson has been head of oil and gas giant Exxon Mobil for the past 10 years. The US-based multinational firm is rated as the biggest oil company in the world. Under its Texas-born CEO, Exxon has developed extensive industrial partnerships with Russia’s oil sector. In 2011, the company signed a mammoth deal worth $500 billion with Russia’s number-one oil firm Rosneft for drilling projects in the Arctic. It has other exploration contracts in Russia’s Siberia and Black Sea.
That partnership was crimped in 2014 when the US government slapped economic and diplomatic sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine crisis. Tillerson is on record expressing his opposition to the sanctions, although Exxon has so far complied with the legal order to suspend ties with Russia. It can be expected that as Secretary of State – the US’s top diplomatic position – Tillerson will rescind those sanctions and seek to normalize relations between Washington and Moscow. His stock-holding interests with Exxon will no doubt stir controversy as a «conflict of interest» in his running of US foreign policy.
A normalizing of US-Russia relations under Tillerson would be fully consonant with Donald Trump’s own stated position of wanting to improve bilateral ties, which over the past two years have deteriorated abysmally to the point of risking an all-out war between the two nuclear powers.
Trump unabashedly referred to Tillerson’s extensive links with Russian business and government as an endorsement for his selection as Secretary of State.
«I have chosen one of the truly great business leaders of the world, Rex Tillerson, Chairman and CEO of ExxonMobil, to be Secretary of State», said Trump.
Of significance, the president-elect added: «[Mr Tillerson] will be a forceful and clear-eyed advocate for America’s vital national interests, and help reverse years of misguided foreign policies and actions that have weakened America’s security and standing in the world».
Like billionaire property magnate Trump, Tillerson has no official political experience. The pair reportedly only became acquainted since Trump’s shock election victory on November 8. Tillerson was recommended to Trump by the former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, according to the Washington Post. Over the course of several recent meetings the two men hit it off, perhaps recognizing similar traits in each other’s personality for putting pragmatic business sense before ideological considerations.
Other names in the mix for possible Secretary of State nomination were former Republican candidate Mitt Romney and ex-CIA chief General David Petraeus. Both would have taken a hostile policy towards Russia. So, the fact that Tillerson was in the end selected by Trump shows that he is determined to follow through on his aspiration to better relations with Russia.
It was a bold decision too. In the days before the nomination was made official, US political figures and media pundits were clamoring with concern about Tillerson’s apparent cordial attitude towards Russian leader Vladimir Putin and the Russian state.
American media have been flagging past photos of Tillerson smiling in friendly greetings with Putin. Much is being made of the Exxon boss having been awarded an Order of Friendship by the Russian president in 2013, two years after the oil company signed the mega deal with Rosneft for Arctic drilling. It was also reported that Tillerson attended an international business summit earlier this year in Russia – in defiance of US government advice not to attend due to its sanctions policy towards Moscow.
Trump’s announcement also comes amid heightened claims that Russian-backed hackers intervened in the US presidential elections to sway his victory over Clinton. Last week, the Washington Post and New York Times ran sensational reports that the CIA had concluded that Russian hackers helped Trump win the presidency by spreading damaging information on Clinton’s involvement in corruption and other scandals. Earlier this week, on the back of those claims, the Obama White House and US Congress have ordered a formal investigation to ascertain the CIA allegations of Russian interference.
Trump’s selection of Tillerson has predictably been invoked as further «evidence» that the Kremlin hacked into the US electoral process in order to put him in the White House.
Largely absent from the brouhaha is the fact that there is no evidence to prove Russia did indeed carry out the hacking of Clinton’s emails or that it did so to influence the election. Russia has repeatedly rejected the claims.
For Trump’s part, he has dismissed the latest anonymous and unverified CIA allegations as «ridiculous». Pointedly, the president-elect has also disclosed that he is rebuffing the intelligence agency’s customary «daily briefings», implying that that they are a waste of his time. That, in turn, suggests that the CIA will dredge up more dirty tricks to discredit Trump as a «Russian stooge». And large sections of the US media which openly favored Clinton will be only too willing to oblige the smearing of Trump.
The nomination of Tillerson to head the State Department is certainly an unusual choice. The multi-millionaire oil chief, who will step down from his Exxon position if officially appointed, does not have the customary Washington political experience. His would-be replacement, John Kerry, was previously a long-time Senator and a consummate political insider. Many critics would say that background was why Kerry was so ineffectual as a diplomat and such a willing tool for Washington’s ideological agenda to antagonize Russia.
But Tillerson’s professional and personal ties with Russia make him a qualified choice to restore balanced relations between Washington and Moscow. It follows that if such an improvement were to prevail then European governments would follow suit in normalizing their relations too.
However, the Exxon CEO is far from a shoo-in for the top diplomatic post. His nomination will have to be cleared by the US Senate. Already, there has been strident objections to Tillerson’s selection from members of the powerful Senate Committee on Foreign Relations precisely because of his alleged friendly connections with Russia. Republican Senator Marco Rubio, a member of the committee, deprecated Tillerson’s selection by saying, «being a friend of Vladimir Putin is not an attribute».
It can be anticipated that the Washington establishment of Republicans and Democrats, who tend to harbor Russophobia and Cold War animosity, will capitalize on CIA claims of Russian «electoral subversion» to whip up opposition to Trump’s pick of Tillerson.
And it’s not just Tillerson who might end up being thwarted. Donald Trump does not become the 45th president until the Electoral College officially passes all its votes on December 19. He would then be inaugurated later in January.
The all-decisive Electoral College is coming under increasing pressure to reverse its earlier votes favoring Trump for the presidency. The intervention by the CIA making sensational claims about Russian interference to help Trump into the White House is reportedly giving some members of the Electoral College misgivings about their erstwhile vote for the Republican candidate.
Such is the level of reality-disconnect in US politics, the selection of Rex Tillerson may actually fuel paranoia that Trump is the alleged Manchurian Candidate that the Clinton campaign and its establishment backers tried to make so much of during the campaign.
Nevertheless, whether Trump’s presidential ambitions eventually become unstuck or not, one can at least give him credit for now that he is sticking to his promise of restoring relations with Russia. Rex Tillerson is the proof of that.
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/12/14/trump-delivers-promise-mend-ties-with-russia.html

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

In The Name of Peace I Disagree With Post US Presidential Campaigning

No To US Liberal Attitudes On US-Presidential Election Results Says  Irene Eckert

Age and Experience may not always be a remedy against being brainwashed in an Orwellian manner.

Exchange of controversial views based on proven facts is a cornerstone of an open society.  Debating issues is an essential means of the democratic process and should never stop. With respect to the electoral process in a constitutional democracy the majority rule must, however,  be respected.





Now,  Joe Gerson, representing the American Friend's Service Committee, also deputy chair of the International Peace Bureau has issued a lengthy statement of how the US public should deal with Donald Trump's being elected as new US president.  Gerson expressed his views in a  letter to  Mr. Archer,  director of the International Peace Bureau in Geneva. Such an evaluation is a matter of broad public concern. The Quaker's comments are the more alarming as they come from a man, whose reputation is that of a devoted and clear minded peace person. The Quakers have always been an important voice for peace.
Gerson's positioning in the aftermath of the  presidential election  unfortunately  reflects the general attitude of the ‘ liberal’ mainstream in and outside the US. The liberal mainstream is mainly restricted  to the  white coastal circles, These circles are  often also referred to as ‘Progressives’, ‘Activists’, ‘Intellectuals’. Their  attitude  differs hardly in substance  from the "Liberal" or “Left”- mindset here in Germany/Europe or in the  larger NATO-guided West. But here and there it fails totally to represent the feelings of the majority of the ordinary people. 

To me, the  anti-Trump furor, blown up by  Main Stream Media  seems an opportunistic attitude, shamefully superficial, a call for bending  knees before power. Unfortunately these "Liberals"  are  contributing to the rise of  “populist” movements, parties and politicians which they officially of course disrespect and stigmatize as right extremists. In reality such "Lefts" and "Liberals" are part of the success  story of  forces whom they publicly scorn. The term ‘alt-right’ might better be applied for those, who invented the new notion.
The arrogant attitude of the entire Western scholarly elite is truely mind boggling. These intellectuals are  out of touch with reality. Liberals, Progressives, Peaceniks, Greens or who else there may be united against Trump, they  are all falling into an old trap.  To call them misguided by  “free” and ‘enlightened’  quality media as the New York Times, Washington Post and other MSM may be a euphemism, because they are part of  this very news media scene. In Germany “Der Spiegel”, DIE ZEIT, Die SÜDDEUTSCHE and the like set the tone. ‘Der Spiegel’ along with other US-lead media* outlets has long become disgustingly hawkish. While US-Liberals are busy trumpeting against their president elect Trump, breaking with due constitutional respect,  the lame EU Parliament adopts a resolution smearing Russian state funded media RT and ‘Sputnik news’ as propaganda. The European MPS outrageously put them on an equal footing with  terrorist ISIS bullhorns. Of course they do not mention BBC, Deutsche Welle or the like.

Reject "Fake News" and PropOrnot, go for the Real Thing

As if all this was  not enough  of labelling,  "Fake News’" via obscure ‘ProporNot.com’ aided by Washington Post  becomes a new US orchestrated buzzword, fingerpointing against  substantial and well researched alternative news channels in the web. Truly fake liberal Lefties all over the place are simply unable to see what is at stake.  Joe Gerson and those following his advice are not  taking a position against such outrageous developments. On the contrary, Gerson uses the questionable term “Fake News”  himself with respect to Trump and his company. The latter must accordingly be  among “fake news providers”, owing  their success to ‘fake news channels’ and 'Russian hackers' plus some ‘Deplorables’ in the Rust Belt. These red neck characters neither have brains nor proper schooling nor do they have  access to ‘quality press’.
Such tactic is smear and slander. It reflects an anti-democratic mindset. Whoever participates in such labelling practices, falls in the McCarthy abyss. Trump’s  undebatable victory must  consequently  be the  result of "Russian meddling", helped by almighty "Russian hackers”. 
One would expect of peace people that they speak out loud against such name calling. One would hope that they  fully understand the difficult situation of the Trump camp, of people who dare to suggest  a much needed  different approach to governing the country. Trump being a  rather lonely voice, a character  who  while at the top dares to question his classmates, their almighty NATO and  its cherished enemy image.

Military Industrie does not want Detente with Russia

Imagine, even if Trump only wanted to achieve one thing, namely Detente vis a vis RUSSIA he would be in the cross hairs.  His challenging proposal to  fight the real terrorists in cooperation with a great and after all Christian nation, with  Russia, is most obviously conflicting with Capital interests. The  combined power apparatus of the US military industrial complex plus Wall Street  along with all  those who pampered  countless terrorists, clearly favored  the corrupt Clinton Clan. Now that they are losing on all fronts  (see Aleppo) they  are doubling down. They  will try everything to prevent Trump from taking over office in January.  The united front of war profiteers are now  putting pressure on the electoral college for not handing  their vote to Trump, as foreseen by the US constitution.
Why do academically trained people in the US, as does the Green loser Jill Stein, support the obnoxious Clinton camp? Surely, they must all know, that questioning the election results,  had it been  successful, would have resulted in inaugurating Clinton. In any case their efforts mean chaos for the country. How peace minded people may want to contribute to paving the path for hawkish Clinton,  seems beyond comprehension to me. Do they not fear the specter of an all out war with Russia and the possibility of a nuclear war? The spin is to project such fears onto Trump!
And yet, this distortion comes not so much  as a surprise. For quite a while, I have been profoundly frustrated with the former  LEFT or peace camp. The same dismay holds for  ‘liberal Progressives’ who serve projects, that are clearly opposite to the notion of peace, cooperation and justice. Of course these very  projects are clad in the colors of progress, in the colors of multi culturalism, in the  rainbow colors of LGBT-rights, in the framework of  promoting Human Rights. The true motives are hidden under Green  grass. Pretending to defend the rights of immigrants, of  stigmatized classes, of deprived and impoverished races.

Beyond the surface of Fake Human Rights Issues
But , however colorful their appearance  may be, they can hardly cover the surface of  their  despicable intentions. Of course we can set things right again. But for this aim we must patiently disseminate the naked facts. It  was not the Trump camp who started the violence after his election victory. The much defamed business mogul spoke moderately and wisely when addressing the public as president elect for the first time. Every body across the world could hear his words.
Hate speeches and the hysteric campaign that followed  landslide Republican  victory  have become the dubious privilege of the “Liberal” camp. These post election upheavals  evoke US Regime Change policies elsewhere. They bear the same handwriting as election fraud campaigns in other countries, financed by Soros and the like. US policies meant for abroad are hitting back home now, so it seems.
Being aware of the global picture, not neglecting home

Trump’s comments and attitudes on foreign policies go in deed wild sometimes, as we are witnessing day by day.  Putting in question the ‘One-China’ policy is certainly not wise. However, the key issue of today remains Russia. The direction Trump wants to go with respect to Russia seems christal clear for a peace minded person. The real danger comes from the military industrial complex opposing such a move. Trump clearly does not represent their interests. Whereas we as peace people do not appreciate his unwise  words upon  Fidel Castro's departure and find his speech at the AIPAC-Convention earlier in the year highly irritating. We also disapprove  of Trumps  weird positioning towards Iran. However, we must see the larger geopolitical picture behind  all this and understand  the mighty forces against him, with whom he has to reckon, if he is serious. We, the people must  help setting things right, if his leadership goes wrong and  we must support him as long as he goes in the right direction. It  may not  always be easy to distinguish. But no president, nor any  dictator can act  on the long run without some consent of the people. It is up to us to find access to the right information,  to remain focused and to demand the right answers to the most burning issues. The rest will follow.
Let us never forget to question whose interests are served by the “not my president” shouters and their backers, whose interests are served by the recount call that a suddenly affluent Jill Stein has launched? It has legally  been stopped now. Otherwise  it may have produced the opposite results.
Will Trump comply?

What will Mr. Trump be able to offer the world after his hopefully successful inauguration? He has made some promising statements on burning foreign policy issues. He wants  to  side with Russia and combat terrorism first. He dared to question the relevance of NATO. He promised to end Regime Change policies. The equation TRUMP = fascist = alt-right = populist = nationalist seems outright  false. The new ‘national vogue’ is a  global one and has very little, if anything, in common with NAZISM of the last century. The national calls of today  are everywhere demanding better relations with Russia. They are calls for sovereignty and  they demand respect for national interests. They are calls for shaking off the  US tutelage. When Trump promises to break with the Regime Change policy of his predecessors, he  surely has the sympathy of the world. All peace-loving people must support him on these declared intentions of his and mobilize towards such objectives. We must oblige him there upon  and give him and peace a chance. 
Fake protest against Russia

The same irritation as for *Gerson’s positioning in his  wild analyses sent to the Director of The International Peace Bureau, goes for the US Peace Council and for most of the Western ‘Peace Movement’ s positioning and as far as I can see for the entire  “Progressive” Scene. We could see this most recently in Berlin, expressed in an "Open  Letter" against Russian policies in Syria signed by writers, film makers, journalists during the Berlin International Literature Festival". Their hateful and unsubstantiated words where accompanied by protests in front the Russian embassy, where  Russia was blamed for atrocities the other side has committed. Names like Volker Schlöndorff, Wolf Bierman,  Cem Özdemir (MP/Green Party), Daniel Cohn-Bendit and many others were among the signatories.

Given such company,  we the ordinary people, do not have many options. We must stay informed and think and act  for ourselves.
____________
* Uwe Krüger, Meinungsmacht der Einfluss von Eliten auf Leitmedien und Alpha-Journalisten - eine kritische Netzwerkanalyse,Köln 2013
see also:
http://uspeacecouncil.org/?p=3077U.S.Peace Council November 25, 2016

Russia plans the recapture of Palmyra from ISIS.

Vladimir Putin prepares Palmyra’s liberation

Russian President Vladimir Putin met today with his Security Council and military and intelligence chiefs to plan the recapture of Palmyra from ISIS.
Russian President Vladimir Putin convened a meeting of Russia’s Security Council this morning, and on this occasion there is no doubt at all about what was the main topic of discussion. 

us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
MEMORANDUM
Allegations of Hacking Election Are Baseless

"There is conclusive evidence that this allegation is wrong, and that the leaks were the work of a Washington insider, and this conclusion is now being backed by a group of former US intelligence officers who drawing on their experience and using their own methodology are now saying the same thing."  http://theduran.com/us-federal-judge-jill-stein-russian-hacking-claim-spectral-borderline-irrational
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/

Monday, December 12, 2016

„Der Wahnsinn muss enden“ – US-Abgeordnete bringen Gesetz gegen Terror-Finanzierung durch USA ein

Tulsi Gabbard, Abgeordnete der Demokraten aus Hawaii, kämpft gegen die Terrorfinanzierung aus US-Steuergeldern.
Tulsi Gabbard, Abgeordnete der Demokraten aus Hawaii, kämpft gegen die Terrorfinanzierung aus US-Steuergeldern. 
US-Kongressabgeordnete wollen mit einer Gesetzesinitiative verhindern, dass US-Steuergelder weiterhin in die Unterstützung oder Bewaffnung terroristischer Gruppen wie IS oder Al Kaida fließen. Vor allem über Drittstaaten oder versteckte Operationen ist dies bislang der Fall.
Gegen die Praxis des indirekten Terrorsponsorings aus US-Steuergeldern wird nun ein Teil des Repräsentantenhauses aktiv. Die Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) und der US Peace Council wollen es unter Führung ihrer Sprecherin Tulsi Gabbard der US-Regierung künftig unmöglich machen, direkt oder indirekt extremistische Gruppen zu unterstützen - sei es durch den Verkauf von Waffen, Trainingsprogramme oder durch geheimdienstliche Unterstützung.
Ebenso soll es mit dem "Stop Arming Terrorists Act" für illegal erklärt werden, jedwede dritte Partei zu unterstützen, die Terroristen fördert.
Russland drängt auf Absonderung der Terroristen von der „moderaten“ Opposition in Syrien
Die Gesetzesinitiative fordert unter anderem, dass jede nationale oder individuelle Zusammenarbeit mit al-Kaida, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (früher bekannt als al-Nusra-Front) oder dem "Islamischen Staat" von der US-Finanzierung abgeschnitten wird.
Konkret fordert die Legislative vom Direktor der Nationalen Geheimdienste auch die Zusammenstellung einer Liste spezifischer Individuen, Nationalstaaten und terroristischer Gruppen, die von dem Gesetz betroffen wären.
Tulsi Gabbard, Abgeordnete aus Hawaii, betonte:
Wenn Sie oder ich al-Kaida oder dem IS Geld, Waffen und Unterstützung zukommen lassen, würde man uns ins Gefängnis stecken. Doch die US-Regierung hat diese Grundsätze über Jahre hinweg ignoriert, indem sie heimlich Verbündete und Partner von al-Kaida, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, des IS und anderer Terror-Gruppen mit Geld, Waffen und geheimdienstlichen Erkenntnissen unterstützte, um den Umsturz in Syrien voranzutreiben.
Die 35-Jährige beschuldigte auch die CIA, überall auf der Welt durch verdeckte Operationen terroristischen Gruppen Geld und Waffen zukommen zu lassen. Dies geschehe mithilfe Saudi-Arabiens, der Türkei, Katars und weiterer Akteure. Sowohl die New York Times als auch das Wall Street Journal hatten diese Verbindungen zuletzt aufgedeckt. Gabbard weiter:
Die CIA hat für lange Zeit eine Gruppe mit dem Namen Fursan al-Haqq unterstützt, indem sie ihr Gehälter, Waffen und Unterstützung zukommen ließ. Die Gruppe kooperiert und kämpft zusammen mit einer weiteren Gruppierung, die als Verbündeter von al-Kaida gilt und versucht, die syrische Regierung zu stürzen. Die Levant Front ist eine andere so genannte "moderate Rebellengruppe", die gegen die syrische Regierung kämpft. Vergangenes Jahr haben die Vereinigten Staaten mithilfe der Türkei dieser Gruppe geheimdienstliche Unterstützung und andere Arten von militärischer Hilfe zukommen lassen. Die Levant Front kämpft zusammen mit al-Kaida. Dieser Wahnsinn muss enden. Wir müssen aufhören, Terroristen zu bewaffnen. Die Regierung muss diese Doppelmoral beenden und denselben Gesetzen unterliegen wie die Bürger dieses Landes.
"Wir müssen die Zerstörungen beenden, für die unser Land verantwortlich ist, indem es immer wieder in diese kontraproduktiven Kriege zum Ziele eines Regime Changes verwickelt wird. Bei der Unterstützung unserer Gegner – Gruppen wie dem IS oder al-Kaida - hört dies längst nicht auf", so die Abgeordnete aus Hawaii.
Gabbard betonte, eine solche Außenpolitik sorge nur für mehr Leid für Menschen in Konfliktzonen, wie etwa in Libyen, in Syrien und dem Irak. Auch habe sie dem gewählten Präsidenten Donald Trump empfohlen, die Agenda des Regime Changes in Syrien zu stoppen und die Unterstützung von Golfstaaten zu beenden, welche die Regierung von Bashar al-Assad nicht unterstützen.
Im Gespräch mit dem CNN-Journalisten Jake Tapper forderte die Demokratin Gabbard zudem ein Ende der US-Interventionspolitik und erklärte, Donald Trumps "America First"-Politik zu unterstützen.https://deutsch.rt.com/nordamerika/44193-wahnsinn-muss-enden-us-gesetz-terrorismus/

If You Are for Peace You Are a Russian Agent Paul Craig Roberts


If You Are for Peace You Are a Russian Agent
EDITOR'S CHOICE | 12.12.2016

Speaking of fake news, the latest issue of the National Enquirer at the supermarket checkout is giving the mainstream presstitute media a run for the money: “Castro’s Deathbed Confession: I Killed JFK. How I framed Oswald.”

That’s almost as good as the fake news going around the presstitute media, such as the TV stations, the Washington Post, New York Times, and Guardian — yes, even the former leftwing British newspaper has joined the ranks of the press prostitutes — that the CIA has concluded that “Russian operatives covertly interfered in the election campaign in an attempt to ensure the Republican candidate’s victory.”
If the CIA is actually stupid enough to believe this, the US is without a competent intelligence agency. Of course, the CIA didn’t say and doesn’t believe any such thing. The fake news stories in the presstitute media are all sourced to unnamed officials. Former British ambassador Craig Murray described the reports accurately: “bullshit.”
So who is making the stories up, another anonomous group tied to Hillary such as PropOrNot, the secret, hidden organization that released a list of 200 websites that are Russian agents?
Fake news is the presstitute’s product. Throughout the presidential primaries and presidential campaign it was completely clear that the mainstream print and TV media were producing endless fake news designed to damage Trump and to boost Hillary. We all saw it. We all lived through it. What is this pretense that Russia is the source of fake news?
We have had nothing but fake news from the presstitutes since the Klingon regime. Fake news was used against Yugoslavia and Serbia in order to cloak the Clinton’s war crimes.
Fake news was used against Osama bin Laden, Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia in order to cloak the Bush regime’s war crimes.
Fake news was used against Libya and Syria in order to cloak the Obama regime’s war crimes.
Without fake news these three blood-drenched presidencies would have been hauled before the War Crimes Commission, tried, and convicted.
Can anyone produce any truthful statement from the presstitute media about anything of importance? MH-17? Crimea? Ukraine?
Ironic, isn’t it, that it is those who purport to be liberal and progressive who are responsible for the revival of McCarthyism in America. Moreover, the liberal progressives are institutionalizing McCarthyism in the US government. There is clearly a concerted effort being made to define truth as fake news and to define lies as truth.
Ironic, isn’t it, that it is the war criminal Hillary, responsible for the destruction of Libya and the near destruction of Syria until the Russians intervened, that the liberal progressive forces are desperate to have as president. Not only did the liberal progressive forces attempt to elect a war criminal president of the US, they are doing their best to delegitimize the president-elect who opposes the orchestrated conflict with Russia.
Ironic, isn’t it, that the liberal progressive bloc refuse to give peace a chance.
The faked news report from the imbeciles at PropOrNot, which was hyped by the fake news sheet, WaPo, claiming that I was a Russian agent was supposed to do my credibility harm. Instead, the 200 List told everyone where they could get good information, and my readership went up. Moreover, I almost got a Russian passport out of it. But before sending it along, Putin checked with Russian intelligence and was informed that I am not on their roster.
The rumor is that if the House intelligence bill passes with Title V intact, those of us on the PropOrNot list could be called before congressional hearings in a replay of McCarthyism. If they waterboard me, I might breakdown and implicate Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Jim Baker, David Stockman, and all the rest. The evidence against us is pretty strong. Trump is suspect because he wants peace with Russia, and so did Reagan. From the standpoint of the Hillary forces and the presstitutes, anyone who wants peace with Russia is bound to be a Russian agent.
The way the presstitutes have framed the issue, there are no legitimate reasons to be for peace.
If Putin and those of us on the 200 List are the ones who actually got Trump elected, shouldn’t Putin or The List be Time magazine’s person of the year and not Trump? After all, if Putin and I did the work, shouldn’t we get the recognition? Why give the credit to the stooge we put in office?
Why is Time magazine shoving those of us responsible off into the background?
Eureka! Time magazine is also a Russian agent and is covering up for us by giving Trump credit for our work. Whew! I won’t be waterboarded after all.
This is your site. Support it.