Monday, August 25, 2014

"Ich habe Putin zu Sanktionen geraten" Stefan Dürr Leiter von Russlands größtem Milchproduzenten.

RUSSLAND"Ich habe Putin zu Sanktionen geraten"

Der Deutsche Stefan Dürr führt Russlands größten Milchproduzenten. Ein Interview über das Importverbot und sein Treffen mit dem russischen Präsidenten. VON FELIX ROHRBECK
schließen
PDF
Speichern
Drucken
Twitter
Facebook
Google +
DIE ZEIT: Herr Dürr, der russische Präsident Wladimir Putin hat einImportverbot gegen westliche Lebensmittel verhängt. Hat Sie das überrascht?
Stefan Dürr: Nein, in Russland haben alle darauf gewartet, dass die Regierung mit Gegenmaßnahmen auf die Sanktionen der EU und der USA antwortet. Überrascht hat mich das nicht. Einen Tag vor dem verkündeten Importstopp saß ich sogar noch mit dem Präsidenten zusammen, und er hat mit mir auch über die Krise gesprochen.
Dürr: Ja. Anfang des Jahres wurde mir für meine Verdienste für die hiesige Landwirtschaft die russische Staatsbürgerschaft verliehen. Nun wollte Putin, dass wir uns besser kennenlernen. Wir haben eine halbe Stunde zu dritt gesprochen, mit dabei war noch der Gouverneur von Woronesch, Alexej Gordejew, in dessen Arbeitszimmer das Gespräch stattfand.ZEIT: Sie haben mit Putin gesprochen?
ZEIT: Und wie ist das Gespräch verlaufen?
Dürr: Putin hat es auf Deutsch begonnen. Später sind wir dann ins Russische gewechselt, weil der Gouverneur nicht so gut Deutsch spricht. Mein Eindruck war, dass Putin die Eskalation der Krise gar nicht recht ist und sie ihm auch nahegeht. Putin ist nicht der harte Macher, als der er im Westen immer dargestellt wird. Auf der anderen Seite ist er aber auch der Letzte, der im aktuellen Konflikt klein beigeben würde.
ZEIT: Hat Putin Sie nach Ihrer Meinung zu den Sanktionen des Westens gefragt?
Dürr: Ja. Und ich habe ihm gesagt, dass ich an seiner Stelle dagegenhalten würde.
ZEIT: Sie setzen sich seit über 20 Jahren für den deutsch-russischen Agrardialog ein, sind dafür sogar mit dem Bundesverdienstkreuz ausgezeichnet worden und raten Putin nun zu Sanktionen?
Dürr: Ja. Ich habe Putin zu Sanktionen geraten. Gerade weil ich mich so intensiv für die deutsch-russischen Beziehungen einsetze, darunter leide, dass derzeit so viel Porzellan zerschlagen wird. Ich glaube, dass Gegenmaßnahmen dem Westen vor Augen führen, wie stark man in vielen Bereichen voneinander abhängig ist.
ZEIT: Wer hat Schuld an dem Konflikt?
Dürr: Ich glaube, dass der Westen die Hauptschuld trägt und immer wieder Öl ins Feuer gießt. Er lässt Putin doch gar keine andere Wahl. Hier bei mir auf dem Land kritisiert man ihn eher noch dafür, dass er zu weich sei. Er kann die Sanktionen nicht einfach hinnehmen. Dann wäre er innenpolitisch tot.
ZEIT: Und warum hat er nun ausgerechnet Sanktionen im Lebensmittelbereichverhängt?
Dürr: Dazu habe ich ihm nicht explizit geraten, aber es macht durchaus Sinn. Denn Putin schlägt zwei Fliegen mit einer Klappe. Er antwortet auf die Sanktionen des Westens, was, glaube ich, die Voraussetzung dafür ist, dass sich beide Parteien irgendwann wieder an einen Tisch setzen. Und er gibt der russischen Landwirtschaft die Chance, sich in einer geschützten Übergangszeit zu entwickeln. Ein Einfuhrverbot etwa für westliche Pkw hätte der heimischen Wirtschaft wenig gebracht, weil nicht absehbar ist, dass wir hier eine wettbewerbsfähige Automobilwirtschaft aufbauen. Bei der Landwirtschaft ist das anders.

Jewish Voices for Peace: NYT ad from JEWISH Descendants of Holocaust Survivors On Criminal Israeli Policy

Here is Michael Rice' Story, one of the Signatories

I was born 1930 to a single Jewish mother and brought up by her in her parents' household.  At six I was taken to a Quaker boarding school established 1934 in large part to protect Jewish children from Germany.  During a visit to The Hague in May 1940 I experienced the five days of German bombing and learned at first hand what true terrorism was: continuous bombing by airplanes. (I see the bombing of Iraq, Afghanistan, Gaza, and the drone attacks, through thr eyes of the ten year olds.)  My mother and I finally got an American visa and were able to leave Germany in Aprtil 1941 in a German airplane plus a Spanish steamer.  We settled in Louisville, Kentucky, where I became active in anti-racism activism and graduated high school 1946.  I began graduate study in physics at Harvard 1950 completing my doctorate in 1958.  As a young father desperate for a research job to support my studies, I was pointed to a research job at the Harvard Medical School in 1955.  Most physics jobs seemed to be in nuclear weaponry, so I was full of happy anticipation to applying my skills to health until my interview revealed that the job would be tio determine ways to deliver anthrax under varioius atmospheric conditions.  The irony of turning a place of healing into a place to study biological warfare furthered the radicalization that had begun in observing the contrast between American ideals and racial practices.
I did not begin the study of Jewish religious practices until my fifties, and finally joined a congregagtion in my sixties.  I greatly valued the teachings about justice and responsibility to the stranger.  But after five or six years I could no longer stand the way any critical look at Israel, let alone any sympathetic look at my fellow refugees -- tbe Palestinians -- could be entertained in organized Jewry.  The topics were avoided as the proverbial elephant in the living room.  My enthusiasm for Jewishness was somewhat revived by the discovery of Rabbi Waskow's Shalom Center and Rabbi Lerner's Tikkun and Network of Spiritual Progressives, and I have found much needed support and fellowship among the Jewish Voice for Peace.

Michael Rice
From: Michael Rice <risprin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: Spokesperson for NYTs ad?
To: Sara Kershnar <skershna@earthlink.net>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Sara Kershnar <skershna@earthlink.net> wrote:
Hello Michael, 

So, we raised the funds for an ad. The ad is going into the NYTs this Saturday as a half-page ad. 

You have a powerful story that we thought people should hear. 

We are working on a press release that will go out tomorrow or Monday (still waiting for input from media people as to whether to send it prior to its print date or after). We are also working on a press conference for Monday or Tuesday (depending on when the press release goes out). Either way it’ll be in the morning. 

We are hoping you will be available to speak to press and/or participate in the press conference. 

If you are willing to play this role, please send us the contact number you’d like to be reached at and a short bio to share with press. 

THANK YOU! 
Sara

No to U.S.-backed wars: Iraq, Palestine/Israel and Ukraine!


UNAC
  (please forward widely)
No to U.S.-backed wars: Iraq, Palestine/Israel and Ukraine
Iraq
The politicians say that the United States, unlike the brutal ISIS, are a civilized people under God.  After all, they point out, we live in a democracy, respect women, and do not impose any religion on others.
Yes, the U.S. “humanitarian” cop of the world acts with moderation, as when it murdered 1.5 million Iraqis during the “civilized” decade-long war to prevent Saddam Hussein from using “weapons of mass destruction” that everyone now knows never existed! Nevertheless, in the name of “democracy,” George Bush did orchestrate “regime change” in Iraq and they had “democratic” elections that the U.S. military supervised. The U.S. puppet Nouri al-Maliki was elected Prime Minister – a real democratic leader indeed!
Today the Obama administration has essentially forced Maliki to resign because he had little or no support among the Iraqi people, who he persecuted and robbed with abandon, including his own Shiite majority.  His was a U.S.-supported and approved death squad and profiteering regime, but now he is to be dispensed with because he is no longer effective in serving U.S. objectives.
Yesterday, when ISIS was on the Syrian side of the border, there were no U.S. objections to its beheadings; there were no objections when ISIS was armed and financed by U.S. allies in Qatar and Saudi Arabia – today ruled by presumably “democratic-minded” monarchs. Yesterday, ISIS was murdering U.S. enemies in Syria. No problem! Today it is murdering “friends” of the U.S. in Iraq! Yesterday it was using stolen Syrian oil to fund the central U.S. “regime change” objective – Assad’s removal. Today ISIS is using the same Syrian oil to fund its Iraqi operations.
Yesterday, U.S. military experts insisted that it was Syria’s Assad who had crossed Obama’s “red line” when Assad was charged with using sarin gas on innocent Syrians. The “evidence” was “beyond dispute” the military experts told the world. Obama was on the verge of bombing Syria, again in the name of “humanitarian” punishment and was only curtailed by mass public protests.  Later, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, as well as experts at MIT and elsewhere, presented the evidence that it was the “rebels” - the ISIS rebels - that used the sarin gas. The matter was dropped. Obama didn’t condemn the ISIS atrocities because after all, they were fighting U.S. enemies!
We see that U.S. weapons are supplied to friends who later become enemies, or the enemies take and/or purchase them from U.S. allies.  ISIS is using hundreds of millions of dollars worth of modern U.S. weapons its fighters have seized from Iraqi forces, while current friends, the Kurds, fight with old Soviet arms.
Muqtada al-Sadr, an influential political and religious leader in Iraq who consistently opposed the presence of foreign forces and called for the immediate end to the occupation, had it right when he cautioned that U.S. bombs in northern Iraq were not meant to help the Iraqi people but rather “to protect U.S. interests.” And what are these interests? Oil! Iraq presides over one of the world’s largest oil reserves in the world. After more than a decade of war, the lion’s share flows into the coffers of U.S. oil corporations.
Rather than withdrawing from Iraq, President Obama assures us that the U.S. will continue to carry out the “limited” military missions, he claims to protect U.S. personnel and facilities, to help stabilize the Iraqi government, and of course, to provide humanitarian relief.
Today the named enemy has changed but the U.S. objective remains the same.  There is no humanitarian will to aid the Azidi minority or the Kurds.  Protecting U.S. interests (synonymous with the interests of the international energy corporations) is always central to any mission. Many military experts agree that airstrikes will not be sufficient and boots on the ground are next.
The U.S. has been fighting against the people of Iraq militarily and with sanctions and occupation for over 20 years. These crimes against humanity must end.
Our demands are the same as ever:
  • No U.S. intervention in Iraq or Syria!
  • Self-determination for the Iraqi people!
  • U.S. Hands Off!



Palestine
With greater brutality and disregard for world opinion than ever before, Israel, with the full backing of the United States, has once again engaged in a genocidal collective punishment of a heroic people who refuse to leave their land or give up their rights.
To date, 2000+ Palestinian Gazans were murdered, 10,000 wounded, and 278,000 displaced from their homes. 75-85 percent of the Palestinian dead and wounded were civilians, many women and children.  Medical facilities were bombed, and Israeli tanks shelled UN schools and refugee centers killing over 50 and wounding hundreds more. UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, Navi Pillay, has indicated that Israel was guilty of war crimes.
The infrastructure of Gaza has been obliterated, with the only power plant bombed to smithereens, virtually all water supplies and sewage treatment facilities wiped out, and 50,000 Gazan homes blown to bits. This horrendous death and destruction comes from one of the world’s most powerful military states, Zionist Israel.
On the Israeli side, three civilians died, one via a mortar and two by primitive rockets. 64 Israeli IDF soldiers were reported to have been killed.  Israel says they have the “right to defend its citizens,” and claims its very existence is threatened by Hamas.  By international law, however, the disproportionate use of force is a war crime and particularly heinous when used to attack an occupied people.
“Israel must attack Gaza even more mercilessly, expel the population and resettle the territory with Jews.” These are the words of Israel’s Deputy Speaker of the Knesset (parliament) Moshe Feiglin, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party. (See Israeli news website Arutz Sheva, July 15.) Feiglin’s program on how it must be done includes attacks using maximum force, with no consideration for “human shields” or “environmental damage.”  He calls for a total siege on Gaza, allowing nothing or no-one to enter or leave.  After the devastating use of firepower, he calls for “conquering” Gaza and eliminating all armed enemies.  Those who are not connected to the “terrorists”, he says, will be allowed to leave Gaza permanently.  He further states that “Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever.” Subsequently, Gaza will “become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews”. Those who manage to stay after a number of years will receive permanent resident status and even Israeli citizenship, contingent on accepting “upon themselves Israel’s rule, substance and way of life of the Jewish State in its Land”.
In truth, Feiglin’s proposal differs little, if at all, from Israeli’s long-standing official policy of apartheid and ethnic cleansing.

We must never forget that the US is entirely complicit, and in fact, Israel could not continue its racist policies of brutal control and subjugation of a captive indigenous population without the political, economic and military backing of the U.S.  The totality of U.S. support was blatantly demonstrated in the Senate’s unanimous bi-partisan “Vote of Shame” on July 17 to pass a resolution supporting the Israeli assault on Gaza in order to “defend its citizens and ensure its survival.” Palestinians and their rights by international law to self-defense and their very survival are never considered.

 

Included in the resolution was the real reason Israel and the U.S. were alarmed and the trigger for the latest wave of violence against the Gazans: “Whereas Hamas entered into a unity government arrangement with Fatah and the Palestinian Authority,” it called on Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas “to dissolve the unity governing arrangement with Hamas and condemn the attacks on Israel.” In fact, the feared unified Palestinian resistance is why the Israeli government had laid plans to attack Gaza long ago.

 

Armed to the teeth to the tune of $3.1 billion yearly – the largest recipient of U.S. “foreign aid,” – an additional $500 million was almost immediately supplied to the settler state to replenish the bombs, missiles and other weapons of war that were “used up” on a near-defenseless Palestinian population.  Another $500 million was contributed for the Iron Dome missile defense system, presumably to defend against the fairly ineffectual Palestinian rockets.
The struggle for Palestinian freedom and rights has gone on for close to 70 years. We must continue our efforts to stand with them, not just at times of heightened Israeli escalation, and as Americans, to particularly focus on ending the criminal collusion of the U.S. government.
Our demands remain:
  • End all U.S. aid to apartheid Israel: military, economic and diplomatic!
  • Self-determination and sovereignty for the Palestinians!
  • End the Israeli occupation and the blockade of Gaza!
  • Stop the Israeli genocide!
  • Support to BDS and the Palestinian Right of Return



Ukraine
The U.S.-backed bombing of Donetz, a city of one million in eastern Ukraine, continues, with U.S.-trained Blackwater-type fighters directly involved along with several well-armed neo-Nazis-led militias that have emerged as storm troopers flying banners emblazoned with swastika-like emblems.
An August 9 New York Times article by Andrew E. Kramer was among the few in the corporate media that formally citied the role of neo-Nazis forces. Kramer wrote:
“The fighting for Donetsk has taken on a lethal pattern: The regular army bombards separatist positions from afar, followed by chaotic, violent assaults by some of the half-dozen or so paramilitary groups surrounding Donetsk who are willing to plunge into urban combat.
“Officials in Kiev say the militias and the army coordinate their actions, but the militias, which count about 7,000 fighters, are angry and, at times, uncontrollable. One known as Azov, which took over the village of Marinka, flies a neo-Nazi symbol resembling a Swastika as its flag.”
These rightwing militias and self-appointed politically-led forces (bolstered by neo-Nazis from countries as far away as Canada and Sweden) are employed especially when the official Ukrainian Army has often proven to be ineffective when ordered to fire on civilians or on volunteer soldiers who have mobilized to defend their cities from a regime they consider illegitimate as well as anti-Russian and chauvinist. Thousands of Ukrainian troops have refused to fight, left Ukraine or joined the Russian Army.
The Ukrainian Army, increasingly equipped with high-tech U.S./NATO supplied modern weapons of war, and instructed by U.S. and NATO “advisers,” now operates with modern fighter jets that daily bomb eastern Ukraine cities – exacting terrible casualties on civilian residents.
The present Ukrainian government drew its authority from the February 20 U.S.-backed and neo-fascist-led coup that stormed the Ukrainian Rada (parliament) and forced the elected President Viktor Yanukovych to flee. The neo-fascist, anti-Semitic, hyper-nationalist, Svoboda (“Freedom”) Party, accompanied by the virulent pro-Nazis, Right Sector formation, led the coup. They trace their ideological roots to the pro-Nazi Ukrainian movements of World War II.
These armed, club-wielding, and often Molotov-cocktail bomb-throwing “democrats” had been let loose by the rump Fatherland Party “opposition” Ukrainian parliamentary oligarchs who seized on the now-refuted false flag accusation that Yanukovych had employed snipers to attack and murder 89 Independence Square (Maidan) demonstrators while wounding 100 others on Feb. 20.
A now confirmed phone call between the Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet and European Union Foreign Affairs Minister Catherine Ashton, reported in the British Guardian and other newspapers, reveals Paet’s view, stated in a verified taped conversation, that “the same snipers [were] killing people from both sides..… behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition.”
This rump “new coalition,” in violation of the Ukrainian constitution, appointed a new government that included five Svoboda and Right Sector ministers including the two top posts in the Ukrainian military as well as the Minister of Agriculture.  The United States rapidly moved to recognize the coup government as the legitimate authority in Ukraine.
While the original Independence Square mobilizations demanded democratic rights and protested government political corruption, they rapidly devolved into militarized neo-fascist-controlled, anti-Semitic and violent racist outpourings and confrontations. Undoubtedly, the CIA, having poured $5 billion into funding a huge number of Ukrainian anti-government NGO’s over the past decade, played a role. Indeed both Senator John McCain and U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland joined the protests, with McCain appearing on the same platform as Svoboda Party leaders.
The U.S. and European Union (EU) interest was to force the Yanukovych government to sign an “Association Agreement” that would guarantee Ukrainian repayment of EU bailout loans via the imposition of massive Greek-style austerity measures. These included huge layoffs of public workers, increased taxes and a 50 percent rise in the cost of basic utilities.
On the military side, the EU/U.S.-pressured agreement was aimed at moving Ukraine into the NATO orbit and eventually at the permanent stationing of NATO troops – posing a more direct military threat to Russia. This has led to heightened tension and concerns about a new Cold War.
A key, but infrequently mentioned element in the present Ukraine government war concerns the U.S. move to acquire the unimpeded right to frack Ukraine’s shale gas reserves, the fourth largest in the world. Indeed, these resources figure highly in U.S. corporate efforts to replace Russia’s exports of fossil fuels to Europe with U.S.-produced natural gas. Behind the U.S.-backed arming and training of the Ukrainian Army and its support to the bombing of eastern Ukrainian cities, lies $ trillions in natural resources that the U.S. seeks to transfer to its privileged corporate interests.
Once again, we are compelled to demand:

  • End U.S. aid to Ukraine’s coup regime!
  • Stop the bombing of Ukrainian cities!
  • U.S. Hands off Ukraine!
  • No to U.S. oil wars!


Dear Friends,

Next week, I will be leaving for Wales in the UK to join with other U.S. Antiwar activists and people throughout Britain and other areas of the world to protest at the NATO summit in Wales (Aug. 30 - Sept 5).  As you may know, the last NATO summit took place in Chicago in 2012 and UNAC played a central role in building the mass demonstration to oppose NATO and the alternative summit where the movement put forward our own vision of a future without war. 

During this period of continuous and simultaneous wars, this year’s actions, which are being built by the British antiwar movement, are extremely important.  I am scheduled to speak at a number of events and hope to represent the movement in this country, along with other U.S. antiwar leaders.


Therefore, I am asking for your support.  If you can donate to help make this trip possible I urge you to do so with a check made out to UNAC and sent to UNAC, PO Box 123, Delmar, NY, 12054.  Please put "No to NATO" in the note section of the check.  Alternatively, you can donate on-line at: https://unacpeace.org/Donate.html
.  This is the normal on-line link to donate to UNAC.  During this period, the donations will be assumed to be for the trip.
Thank you for your support.

Peace,
Joe Lombardo
UNAC co-coordinator
PS. If you will be at the anti-NATO protests in Wales, please let us know at UNACpeace@gmail.com so we can coordinate with you.
2012 Chicago demonstration against NATO
Alternative summit during Chicago NATO protests

8/19/14

click here to donate to UNAC
Click here for the Facebook UNAC group.




To remove yourself from the UNAC listserv, please send an email to: UNAC-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net
To add yourself to the UNAC listserv, please send an email to: 
UNAC-subscribe@lists.riseup.net




Wird Deutschland von den USA an die Front gedrängt? Karl Müller, ZEIT-Fragen

US-Gesetzentwurf sieht enge US-deutsche «Kooperation» in der Konfrontation mit Russland vor

Wird Deutschland von den USA an die Front gedrängt?

US-Gesetzentwurf sieht enge US-deutsche «Kooperation» in der Konfrontation mit Russland vor

von Karl Müller
Dem ehemaligen hohen US-amerikanischen Regierungsbeamten und heutigen Publizisten Paul Craig Roberts haben wir es zu verdanken, von einem Gesetzentwurf von 22 US-Senatoren – also fast der Hälfte aller Senatsmitglieder – Kenntnis erhalten zu haben.1 Der Gesetzentwurf hat den die Tatsachen auf den Kopf stellenden Titel «To prevent further Russian aggression toward Ukraine and other sovereign states in Europe and Eurasia, and for other purposes» («Zur Verhinderung weiterer russischer Angriffe auf die Ukraine und andere souveräne Staaten in Europa und Eurasien und für andere Zwecke») und ist nachzulesen unter https://beta.congress.gov/113/bills/s2277/BILLS-113s2277is.pdf. Paul Craig Roberts schreibt dazu: «Die Existenz dieser ‹russischen Aggression› wird nur behauptet, aber nicht nachgewiesen. Es gibt weder (russische) Positionspapiere noch Dokumente, aus denen sich ein wie immer gearteter Expansionsdrang Russlands ablesen liesse.»
Besonders interessant an diesem Gesetzentwurf (siehe Kasten) ist, dass eine enge «Kooperation» mit Deutschland festgeschrieben werden soll. Die Bürger Deutschlands wurden dazu bislang nicht befragt. Wer in der deutschen Regierung und der deutschen Politik davon etwas weiss, ist bislang nicht bekannt.
Der Gesetzentwurf sieht eine stärkere Stellung der US-Streitkräfte in Europa und Eurasien vor. Die Basen der Raketenabwehr an Russlands Grenzen, welche die strategischen russischen Raketen abfangen soll, sollen beschleunigt errichtet werden. Mehr Geld soll für die Aufrüstung Polens und der baltischen Staaten ausgegeben werden. Milliarden von Dollars sollen in NGO in Russland gepumpt werden, um Russland auf die gleiche Art und Weise wie die Ukraine zu destabilisieren. Die Streitkräfte und Geheimdienste der Ukraine sollen massiv ausgebaut werden, und die Ukraine, Georgien und Moldawien sollen in die Nato aufgenommen werden. Durch die Ausweitung von US-Gasexporten nach Eu­ropa soll der bisherige Import von russischem Erdgas weitgehend ersetzt und eine Abhängigkeit vom US-Gas geschaffen werden.
«Kooperation» mit Deutschland bedeutet de facto, dass Deutschlands Politik gegen Russland den US-amerikanischen Vorgaben folgen soll. Ging Zbigniew Brzezinski in seinem Ende der neunziger Jahre geschriebenen Buch «Die einzige Weltmacht. Amerikas Strategie der Vorherrschaft» noch davon aus, Frankreich und Deutschland gemeinsam seien die europäischen Kontinentalmächte, die für die US-amerikanische Vorherrschaft auf dem eurasischen Festland am wichtigsten sind,2 und dass sich von Frankreich und Deutschland aus ein Keil über Polen und die Ukraine bis an Russlands Grenzen bilden lasse,3 so konzentriert man sich nun in Wa­shington offenbar ganz auf Deutschland! Nach Lage der Dinge nicht, weil man Deutschland in Washington besonders schätzt (siehe NSA-Aktivitäten, von denen Deutschland ganz besonders betroffen ist), sondern als geschickter Schachzug:
•    Deutschland gilt in Washington als «unsicherer Kantonist», der wieder stärker eingebunden werden muss.
•    Deutschland hat bislang gute Beziehungen zu Russland gehabt, die jetzt zerstört werden sollen.
•    Es kümmert in Washington auch heute noch kaum einen etwas, wenn Deutschland den höchsten Preis für die Konfrontation mit Russland zahlen muss.
Wie schon einmal in der Geschichte? Als Historiker hat man gelernt, dass sich Geschichte nicht wiederholt. Nichtsdestoweniger fallen Analogien auf. Heute ist es wissenschaftlich belegt, dass Kreise aus den USA Hitler-Deutschland mit aufgebaut haben, vor allem, um dieses Hitler-Deutschland gegen die Sowjetunion in den Krieg ziehen zu lassen4 und dadurch sogleich die kommunistische Sowjet­union und das noch immer zu mächtige und unberechenbar wirkende Deutschland auszuschalten.
Heute werden die nach wie vor ungebrochenen US-amerikanischen Weltmachtgelüste durch eine Reihe einflussreicher deutscher Politiker wie den Bundespräsidenten Joachim Gauck rhetorisch verbrämt in die Öffentlichkeit transportiert.
Aber nach wie vor will die grosse Mehrheit der Deutschen das nicht. Ein Blick nach Deutschland (siehe Artikel auf Seite 7) zeigt, dass die Menschen ganz woanders der Schuh drückt. Und dass es die Verantwortung und die Pflicht der politischen Klasse wäre, hierfür nach sozial gerechten und demokratischen Lösungen zu suchen. Das eigene Land statt dessen in eine Konfrontation für fremde Interessen und mit unabsehbarem Ausgang zu treiben, ist ein politisch krimineller Akt.    •
1    Original vom 24.7.2014: www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/07/24/washington-escalating-orchestrated-ukrainian-crisis-war-paul-craig-roberts/; Deutsche Übersetzung durch «Luftpost. Friedenspolitische Mitteilungen aus der US-Militärregion Kaiserslautern/Ramstein» vom 5.8.2014 (http://www.luftpost-kl.de/luftpost-archiv/LP_13/LP11714_050814.pdf)
2    Zbigniew Brezinski. Die einzige Weltmacht. Amerikas Strategie der Vorherrschaft, 1999, dort insbesondere das Kapitel «Der demokratische Brückenkopf», Seite 89ff
3    ebenda, Karte auf Seite 128
4    Als einer der ersten hatte der britische Historiker Antony C. Sutton 1976 in seinem Buch «Wall Street und the Rise of Hitler» (in deutscher Übersetzung mit dem Titel «Wallstreet und der Aufstieg Hitlers», erst 2008 erschienen) Belege für diese These vorgelegt. Es folgten deutschsprachige Bücher wie die von Walter Hofer und Herbert R. Reginbogin im Jahr 2001, «Hitler, der Westen und die Schweiz 1936–1945», von Eva Schweizer im Jahr 2004, «Amerika und der Holocaust. Die verschwiegene Geschichte», oder von Guido Giacomo Preparata im Jahr 2010, «Wer Hitler mächtig machte. Wie britisch-amerikanische Finanzeliten dem Dritten Reich den Weg bereiteten».

Auszug aus dem Gesetzentwurf S. 2277, Seite 13, Section 105

105. Verstärkte Kooperation zwischen den Usa und Deutschland in Fragen der globalen und der Europäischen Sicherheit
(a) Politik – Es ist die Politik der US-Regierung, eng mit der Regierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in allen Problemen der globalen und der europäischen Sicherheit zusammenzuarbeiten, besonders im Hinblick auf die aktuellen Ereignisse in Europa und Eurasien.
(b) Einrichtung einer gemeinsamen Arbeitsgruppe der usa und Deutschlands zur globalen und Europäischen Sicherheit – Der Präsident soll eine gemeinsame Arbeitsgruppe der USA und Deutschlands zu Sicherheitsfragen einberufen, die sich um gemeinsame Belange kümmert, zum Beispiel um dieEntwicklung in der Ukraine, und die ­politische, wirtschaftliche und militärische Zusammenarbeit beider Staaten verbessert – einschliesslich des Informationsaustausches zwischen den Geheimdiensten beider Staaten.
(c) Regelmässige Treffen – Die unter (b) beschriebene Arbeitsgruppe soll sich regelmässig treffen: auf Ministerebene und darüber jährlich, auf Staatssekretärsebene und darüber halbjährlich und auf Ebene der Abteilungsleiter und darüber vierteljährlich.
(d) Genehmigung von Finanzmitteln – Der (US-)Aussenminister erhält von 2015 bis 2017 in jedem Haushaltsjahr 5 000 000 Dollar, die für die unter (b) und (c) aufgeführten Aktivitäten zu verwenden sind.
(e) Berichtspflicht – Nicht später als 180 Tage nach dem Inkrafttreten dieses Gesetzes und danach jährlich soll der Präsident den zuständigen Kongressausschüssen einen Bericht über die Treffen der Arbeitsgruppen zu den unter (b) genannten Themen vorlegen, der neben einer Darstellung der von der jeweiligen Arbeitsgruppe diskutierten Themen und gefassten Beschlüsse auch alle Bemühungen enthalten soll, die unternommen wurden, um die Beziehungen zwischen der Regierung der USA und der Regierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zu verbessern, auszuweiten und zu vertiefen.
Quelle: http://www.luftpost-kl.de/luftpost-archiv/LP_13/LP11714_050814.pdf

Die Bilanz seit Putins Präsidentschaft

Putin ist ein Russe der russische Politik für Rußland macht. Seine  Bilanz sieht so aus

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Ukraine Atrocities: The Illegal Use of White Phosphorous Fire Bombs Against Donetsk Civilians

 116 
  143  8 
 
  447
PHOSPHOROUS
A report on August 15th from Russian Television alleged that the Ukrainian government that the U.S. installed in February of this year was resorting to internationally banned white phosphorous firebombs in order to help destroy the million people who lived in the now Ukrainian separatist capital of Donetsk. It lands super-hot and starts fires and burns to death almost anyone it touches.
The Ukrainian separatists are the residents in Ukraine’s southeast, where Viktor Yanukovych, the Ukrainian President, was elected overwhelmingly by the votes of the people in this region in 2010. They reject the government that Obama installed, and are therefore seeking independence from it. They reject that government not so much because Obama is forcing it on them, as because that government is trying to exterminate them.
Here is the original televised news report on the alleged August 14th firebombing of the Leninsky District in Donetsk:
A separate local Donetsk video of it is here:
And here is alleged to be a picture of the resulting burnt rubble.
Meanwhile, Russia opens more refugee camps, and the West blocks Russia from sending aid into the Ukrainian cities that are being bombed: food, water, and medicines.
But then, a news report on August 16th from eturbonews was headlined “Alleged War Crime: White Phosphorus Used in Residential Areas of Donetsk?” and it reported why there had not been immediate news-reporting of the results of this firebombing, if it had indeed occurred:
“According to eTN sources in Donetsk, WP bombs landed in residential areas in Donetsk at the Lenin district of Donetsk city, Petrovski district of Donetsk city and near the railway station Mandrykino. … The situation in Luhansk without electricity, water and food can be compared with activities used when committing genocide. Ukrainian forces isolated [the] East Ukrainian city and are not allowing water, food and medicine through after destroying electricity and communication services. According to an eyewitness statement Ukrainian army check points let travelers drive to the Eastern Ukraine, but no one is able to leave the Eastern part of the country. It’s like a big prison with hundred[s of] thousands of people and without food, water and electricity. … Scenes of devastation are emerging from across the city, with many buildings burned out or riddled with shell-holes. A large number of private homes in Donetsk have been burned down as firefighters fail to extinguish fires caused by shelling.” So, their source confirmed it.
So: the Ukrainian regime that the U.S. installed has simply been blocking off any ability of official ‘news’ media into Donetsk to report on the massacre. In other words: anyone who is still waiting for ‘news’ media to tell them about this firebombing will be waiting until everyone is dead and no one even cares, because it’ll then no longer be even ‘news’ at all — by then it’ll be only history. But that’s what it indeed will be.
And so will the people who had lived in Donetsk, just history, like the people who lived in Hiroshima, or in Dresden, or who were bombed to death by Germany’s Nazis in London, etc. Of course, the determinant of whether the victims here will be viewed sympathetically by history will be which side ultimately writes the history books on this war. But did the residents of Dresden and Hiroshima have any guilt that justified their being destroyed in this way? Perhaps one might say that most of them were either fascists or nazis and supported such barbarians, who would do such things.
However, one can’t even assert that here, because these victims in southeast Ukraine were instead trying to protect
themselves from Ukraine’s nazis, who are our people in Ukraine. It’s “our side” that are the barbarians, the nazis, here. The victims are trying to protect themselves from us — from the people that the U.S. installed into power.
Are we guilty? If we support this government, we certainly are. Those of us who support it are the guilty ones here; those are the people who willingly share in Obama’s clear guilt on this matter (Obama being the person who appointed the persons, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, who appointed the person, Victoria Nuland, who appointed the person, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who appointed the new Ukrainian Defense Minister, Mikhail Koval, who designed this ethnic-cleansing program and who even announced it to the public. And anyone in the U.S. House of Representatives who fails to introduce an impeachment resolution against Obama for his nazism in this regard is certainly guilty, along with Obama. If Obama isn’t even impeached and removed from office for bringing about and endorsing the perpetrators of this and other such atrocities in Ukraine, as he has done, then Americans have no reason to expect ultimately to be treated any better by the nazis that we then allow to remain in power  over us Americans. Nazism is profoundly un-American.
Any member of the U.S. House of Representatives who opposes impeaching Obama over this should certainly be removed by his or her voters this fall. That’s crystal clear, because Obama is the first-ever U.S. President to install a nazi regime anywhere in the world. He is veritably spitting not only onto the graves of all U.S. soldiers who died fighting nazis in World War II; he is even spitting onto the graves of America’s Founders, who would be shocked and appalled that between America’s greatness in WW II and today, America has descended so, from heaven, into hell.
What we do now will determine whether that’s where we will stay and where we belong. Because any country that continues to back this, belongs in hell. That’s for sure.
As to why Obama is doing that, I have written many articles about that, such as here and here. And that produces this, which produces this.
As they used to say: “Never again.” But this time, it’s up to us, not up to Germans or anybody else. It’s up to us, alone, to stop doing this.
On which side of this will the American people be? America’s heroic Founders, and our heroic soldiers who were killed in WWII, ask us this question from the beyond. Are we on this side, or on Obama’s? Each American, and especially each member of the U.S. House of Representatives, must ask and answer  that question.
These are extraordinary times, if for no other reason that this is the first U.S. President who has ever been (despite his deceptively liberal rhetoric) a nazi in the White House. No other one has ever done this.